Whats up with judges????????

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bushbaby
    Wild Apache
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Dec 2008
    • 23513
    • 727
    • 370
    • 32,078

    #1

    Whats up with judges????????

    I get frustrated sometimes with how judges see fights,here are 2 fights I will use as my examples,hopefully u all can notice my comparisons!!De La Hoya-Mayweather,Cory Spinks-Jermain Taylor!!They were almost identical in way of performance,Mayweather fought defensively,and boxed using the ring and running "no offence",to a victory,about a week after,Spinks did the same thing and the judges gave the fight to Taylor,stating that he was the aggressor and deserved the win,what can be done to get more consistent decisions???????
  • -MAKAVELLI-
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Aug 2008
    • 50080
    • 3,580
    • 2,792
    • 169,000

    #2
    im still waiting for anyone to breakdown the 116-111 score for berto

    Comment

    • ИATAS
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jul 2007
      • 36648
      • 2,509
      • 1,953
      • 50,835

      #3
      there definitely needs to be more consistency with scoring. I don't know how to accomplish that, maybe more thorough training on how to actually score fights.

      With that said keep in mind judges don't have the luxury of instant replays and great camera views. They are sitting on one side of the ring and don't always see exactly what we see.

      Comment

      • Scott9945
        Gonna be more su****ious
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Mar 2007
        • 22032
        • 741
        • 1,371
        • 30,075

        #4
        Originally posted by cruzan mario
        I get frustrated sometimes with how judges see fights,here are 2 fights I will use as my examples,hopefully u all can notice my comparisons!!De La Hoya-Mayweather,Cory Spinks-Jermain Taylor!!They were almost identical in way of performance,Mayweather fought defensively,and boxed using the ring and running "no offence",to a victory,about a week after,Spinks did the same thing and the judges gave the fight to Taylor,stating that he was the aggressor and deserved the win,what can be done to get more consistent decisions???????
        I don't see any comparison in those two fights. Both times the right fighter got his hand raised.

        Comment

        • larryx
          Banned
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • May 2008
          • 13892
          • 225
          • 108
          • 15,442

          #5
          spinks-taylor-pbf-oscar-were to completly differant fights..how can you say floyd had 0 offense when he landed more punches than oscar....ans taylor outlanded spinks who did nothing

          Comment

          • S.G.
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • May 2008
            • 9412
            • 296
            • 635
            • 16,360

            #6
            sometimes i know i could do a better, more objective job than some of these guys... and i'm hardly a veteran or the most knowledgable person on boxing amongst knowledgable people......... there must be better candidates out there than alot of the guys we have now


            oh and also, this:
            Originally posted by larryx
            spinks-taylor-pbf-oscar-were to completly differant fights..how can you say floyd had 0 offense when he landed more punches than oscar....ans taylor outlanded spinks who did nothing

            Comment

            • catalinul
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Sep 2008
              • 6581
              • 115
              • 49
              • 13,580

              #7
              As boring as Spinks is,he should be robbed every fight.

              Comment

              • S.G.
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • May 2008
                • 9412
                • 296
                • 635
                • 16,360

                #8
                Originally posted by ИATAS206
                With that said keep in mind judges don't have the luxury of instant replays and great camera views. They are sitting on one side of the ring and don't always see exactly what we see.
                i was under the impression they had TV screens to watch it now... like commentator's do

                if not, then they definitely should, imo

                Comment

                • larryx
                  Banned
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • May 2008
                  • 13892
                  • 225
                  • 108
                  • 15,442

                  #9
                  Originally posted by S.G.
                  sometimes i know i could do a better, more objective job than some of these guys... and i'm hardly a veteran or the most knowledgable person on boxing amongst knowledgable people......... there must be better candidates out there than alot of the guys we have now


                  oh and also, this:
                  so r u agreeing with me????

                  Comment

                  • S.G.
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • May 2008
                    • 9412
                    • 296
                    • 635
                    • 16,360

                    #10
                    Originally posted by larryx
                    so r u agreeing with me????
                    ...yeah.......

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP