De La Hoya or Trinidad?
Collapse
-
-
You've lost all credibility with me.De La Hoya vs Vargas.........Trinidad vs Vargas
De La Hoya vs B-Hop......... Trinidad vs B-Hop
De La Hoya vs Mayorga...... Trinidad vs Mayorga
I personally think Oscar's fights were the most exciting ones, Trinidad got dropped by all three opponents and Oscar only by B-Hop. I watched all of them, and Trinidad's were boring.
One could argue that Tito-Vargas is the best of all three. Not to mention how Tito fought those guys way earlier at weights they preferred.Comment
-
Really?? you don't say...well didn't Oscar move up to Jr Middleweight to fight Vargas, while nobody gave Oscar a chance just because Vargas was accompanied to the ring by Chavez? lol that was hilarius!
And didn't Oscar move up to Middleweight where he didn't belong and fought B-Hop? get your **** straight man!
much love to Tito, but you guys are pathetic, the Oscar hate has you blinded.Comment
-
Tito fought the better fresher version of all of them!!!! If you think the Trinidad fights were boring you should stabb yourself in the face!!!!!!!!!!De La Hoya vs Vargas.........Trinidad vs Vargas
De La Hoya vs B-Hop......... Trinidad vs B-Hop
De La Hoya vs Mayorga...... Trinidad vs Mayorga
I personally think Oscar's fights were the most exciting ones, Trinidad got dropped by all three opponents and Oscar only by B-Hop. I watched all of them, and Trinidad's were boring.Comment
-
[/U][/B]
Really?? you don't say...well didn't Oscar move up to Jr Middleweight to fight Vargas, while nobody gave Oscar a chance just because Vargas was accompanied to the ring by Chavez? lol that was hilarius!
And didn't Oscar move up to Middleweight where he didn't belong and fought B-Hop? get your **** straight man!
much love to Tito, but you guys are pathetic, the Oscar hate has you blinded.
and mayorga was ko once before tito. his record was 26-4. after tito gave him that beating he has been a journey man.Comment
-
Trinidad-B-Hop...yeah. It was boring. I'm not sayin' it because Tito lost, it's because it was so one-sided that it took out the drama of it all. Well, most of it anyway.De La Hoya vs Vargas.........Trinidad vs Vargas
De La Hoya vs B-Hop......... Trinidad vs B-Hop
De La Hoya vs Mayorga...... Trinidad vs Mayorga
I personally think Oscar's fights were the most exciting ones, Trinidad got dropped by all three opponents and Oscar only by B-Hop. I watched all of them, and Trinidad's were boring.
Trinidad-Mayorga...haven't stuck around to watch the ENTIRE fight. Can't say.
Trinidad-Vargas...how the heck could you find this one boring? Trinidad-Vargas had everything. Undefeated, ****y fighters, champions (if I'm not mistaken), in their prime, both had power, PR-Mexican rivalry, mutual dislike for one another, knockdowns by both fighters, fouls from both fighters, point deductions by both fighters, blood, back and forth action. That fight had all the ingredients...Comment
-
This guy agenda is hugging to DLHs nuts. Saying Tito vs Vargas or Mayorga was boring, is like saying that you hate boxing!!!!!!!!!Trinidad-B-Hop...yeah. It was boring. I'm not sayin' it because Tito lost, it's because it was so one-sided that it took out the drama of it all. Well, most of it anyway.
Trinidad-Mayorga...haven't stuck around to watch the ENTIRE fight. Can't say.
Trinidad-Vargas...how the heck could you find this one boring? Trinidad-Vargas had everything. Undefeated, ****y fighters, champions (if I'm not mistaken), in their prime, both had power, PR-Mexican rivalry, mutual dislike for one another, knockdowns by both fighters, fouls from both fighters, point deductions by both fighters, blood, back and forth action. That fight had all the ingredients...Comment
-
To Thread Starter-
Your not making any sense at times. You argue that De la Hoya's victories were more convincing than Tito's. Then you say Oscar fights were more exciting. But if Tito fights were closer than wouldn't that give them more drama, hence making them better.
Vargas nor Myorga had ever tasted the canvas before they met Tito. After that fight Myorga tasted it 3 times, and Vargas 5times. I compare it to QB concussions. Once your bell gets rung, your more suseptible. De la hoya fought weaker versions. Tito ruined them.
Breaking it down. Oscars 3 fights-4 knockdowns. Titos 3 fights 11 knockdowns. And given that you think all the fights were closer in Oscar's favor, Tito's must of had more dram considering triple the knockdowns.
All and all both are great fighters but Tito had more balls and it showed in his fighting style, and you knew that everytime coming to the ring he was going to try and knock the other guy out.
Oscar was an exciting fighter but Tito was easily more exciting.Last edited by KiloTeague; 01-19-2009, 10:00 PM.Comment
-
I totally agree. Thius was actually a perfect post. Green k!!!!!!!!!!!!!!To Thread Starter-
Your not making any sense at times. You argue that De la Hoya's victories were more convincing than Tito's. Then you say Oscar fights were more exciting. But if Tito fights were closer than wouldn't that give them more drama, hence making them better.
Vargas nor Myorga had ever tasted the canvas before they met Tito. After that fight Myorga tasted it 3 times, and Vargas 5times. I compare it to QB concussions. Once your bell gets rung, your more suseptible. De la hoya fought weaker versions. Tito ruined them.
Breaking it down. Oscars 3 fights-4 knockdowns. Titos 3 fights 11 knockdowns. And given that you think all the fights were closer in Oscar's favor, Tito's must of had more dram considering triple the knockdowns.
All and all both are great fighters but Tito had more balls and it showed in his fighting style, and you knew that everytime coming to the ring he was going to try and knock the other guy out.
Oscar was an exciting fighter but Tito was easily more exciting.Comment
Comment