Do you guys even understand what a robbery truly is?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Check
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • May 2008
    • 16585
    • 677
    • 132
    • 26,287

    #1

    Do you guys even understand what a robbery truly is?

    I keep seeing posts of how Collazo was robbed. First off he didn't win the fight he lost 114-113. Even if he did win it was an extremely close fight. When you are robbed it is in a fight that you clearly have won. A robbery would be like Santa Cruz V Casamayor. This was far from a "robbery".
  • P4PKING2008
    Banned
    • Jan 2009
    • 325
    • 27
    • 14
    • 480

    #2
    Taylor Pavlik II was a robbery. Hopkins Calz was. Collazo Berto was not.

    Comment

    • Vladimir303
      303
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • May 2007
      • 6067
      • 398
      • 276
      • 12,727

      #3
      Originally posted by P4PKING2008
      Taylor Pavlik II was a robbery. Hopkins Calz was. Collazo Berto was not.
      Ok now you're being a dip****.

      Comment

      • johnm is...
        ****in *** Broads
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Oct 2005
        • 10700
        • 820
        • 1,382
        • 48,813

        #4
        You know how it works around here. If the fighter you want to win, doesn't win, it's a clear cut robbery.

        Comment

        • Albo Da Kid
          Banned
          • Mar 2008
          • 638
          • 14
          • 20
          • 772

          #5
          The biggest robbery i have seen was Toney vs Griffin 2. This is not a robbery. Maybe close but not a robbery

          Comment

          • catalinul
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Sep 2008
            • 6581
            • 115
            • 49
            • 13,580

            #6
            Originally posted by P4PKING2008
            Taylor Pavlik II was a robbery. Hopkins Calz was. Collazo Berto was not.
            WTF are you talking about?Those were close fights too.

            Comment

            • Zerwas1
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Nov 2005
              • 2878
              • 119
              • 205
              • 9,990

              #7
              Sure, it's a robbery as soon as their favourite fighter lost a fight by decision.

              Comment

              • Pullcounter
                no guts no glory
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jan 2004
                • 42582
                • 549
                • 191
                • 49,739

                #8
                yeah for it to be a robbery collazo had to have clearly won, but it was a close fight

                Comment

                • markfrombrookly
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Oct 2006
                  • 1539
                  • 89
                  • 26
                  • 9,791

                  #9
                  Vernon Forrest vs Ike Quartey = Definition of ROBBERY

                  Comment

                  • Underdog82
                    Banned
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • Jun 2007
                    • 953
                    • 43
                    • 0
                    • 1,116

                    #10
                    Originally posted by P4PKING2008
                    Taylor Pavlik II was a robbery. Hopkins Calz was. Collazo Berto was not.
                    LOL Not even close.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP