DiBella says Berto-Collazo rematch later this year

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MWMerlino
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • May 2008
    • 1086
    • 44
    • 77
    • 7,207

    #31
    if all of the judges scored the fight 114-113 for berto no one would say robbery.

    Comment

    • THe TRiNiTY
      Sugar-Will O'-Hurricane
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Dec 2006
      • 10079
      • 405
      • 103
      • 17,986

      #32
      Originally posted by Hitman932
      Why? Collazo can't win against Berto no matter how many rounds he wins.
      Perhaps. Nonetheless, you owe me some points.

      Comment

      • THe TRiNiTY
        Sugar-Will O'-Hurricane
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Dec 2006
        • 10079
        • 405
        • 103
        • 17,986

        #33
        THe problem with close fights is, if you want the guy who doesn't get the nod to win, it becomes a robbery. I slightly wanted and thought Marquez beat Pacquiao in the rematch, and in the first fight for that matter. Nonetheless, neither fight was a robbery. Fights are close, it happens. If one guy wins 7 rounds, and the other guy wins 5 on your scorecard, it's not a robbery either way. It means two rounds were seen differently by another person.

        It's called an opinion. Even Collazo didn't look like he felt robbed. He looked like a guy willing to admit this fight was up in the air.

        Comment

        • MJ406
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Aug 2007
          • 4370
          • 61
          • 211
          • 12,288

          #34
          Originally posted by ..Calderon...
          THe problem with close fights is, if you want the guy who doesn't get the nod to win, it becomes a robbery. I slightly wanted and thought Marquez beat Pacquiao in the rematch, and in the first fight for that matter. Nonetheless, neither fight was a robbery. Fights are close, it happens. If one guy wins 7 rounds, and the other guy wins 5 on your scorecard, it's not a robbery either way. It means two rounds were seen differently by another person.

          It's called an opinion. Even Collazo didn't look like he felt robbed. He looked like a guy willing to admit this fight was up in the air.

          yeah IMO the words robbery + Controversial get thrown on here way too much

          the only thing remotely controversial about Berto-Collazo is the one score of 116-111

          i personally had it 114-113 Berto

          **Thought Lederman's scorecard was pretty accurate minus giving Luis rounds 6 and 7.

          Comment

          • 5punchcombo
            Banned
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Jul 2008
            • 788
            • 22
            • 38
            • 887

            #35
            Originally posted by Hitman932
            Why? Collazo can't win against Berto no matter how many rounds he wins.
            Agreed....................................

            Comment

            • nozorok
              Interim Champion
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Jul 2006
              • 955
              • 28
              • 41
              • 7,405

              #36
              It's a fairly safe fight against Collazo someone that doesn't have a whole lot of power. It delays the inevitable knockout loss Berto will suffer as soon as he steps up against a live body with power.

              Comment

              • ferocity
                NOV. 3, NEW CHAMPION
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Feb 2006
                • 15629
                • 313
                • 257
                • 23,031

                #37
                Just seen the fight and it was close. Berto just don't like to listen to his corner and he can hang inside but not well educated. I see no reason why either side belive they won.

                Comment

                Working...
                TOP