if all of the judges scored the fight 114-113 for berto no one would say robbery.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
DiBella says Berto-Collazo rematch later this year
Collapse
-
THe problem with close fights is, if you want the guy who doesn't get the nod to win, it becomes a robbery. I slightly wanted and thought Marquez beat Pacquiao in the rematch, and in the first fight for that matter. Nonetheless, neither fight was a robbery. Fights are close, it happens. If one guy wins 7 rounds, and the other guy wins 5 on your scorecard, it's not a robbery either way. It means two rounds were seen differently by another person.
It's called an opinion. Even Collazo didn't look like he felt robbed. He looked like a guy willing to admit this fight was up in the air.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ..Calderon... View PostTHe problem with close fights is, if you want the guy who doesn't get the nod to win, it becomes a robbery. I slightly wanted and thought Marquez beat Pacquiao in the rematch, and in the first fight for that matter. Nonetheless, neither fight was a robbery. Fights are close, it happens. If one guy wins 7 rounds, and the other guy wins 5 on your scorecard, it's not a robbery either way. It means two rounds were seen differently by another person.
It's called an opinion. Even Collazo didn't look like he felt robbed. He looked like a guy willing to admit this fight was up in the air.
yeah IMO the words robbery + Controversial get thrown on here way too much
the only thing remotely controversial about Berto-Collazo is the one score of 116-111
i personally had it 114-113 Berto
**Thought Lederman's scorecard was pretty accurate minus giving Luis rounds 6 and 7.
Comment
Comment