Why did Lederman give Collazo round 8????

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Check
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • May 2008
    • 16585
    • 677
    • 132
    • 26,287

    #1

    Why did Lederman give Collazo round 8????

    Not only was his scorecard awful tonight he game Collazo round 8. If you guys watch that round it was one sided with Berto landing all the shots. Collazo hardly landed anything yet Lederman gives him the round? This was Ledermans worst job in years.
  • Crazylegs77
    null and void
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jan 2008
    • 13101
    • 445
    • 296
    • 21,573

    #2
    Originally posted by B-Ron
    Not only was his scorecard awful tonight he game Collazo round 8. If you guys watch that round it was one sided with Berto landing all the shots. Collazo hardly landed anything yet Lederman gives him the round? This was Ledermans worst job in years.
    Was that the round when Collazo placed an occasional lunging jab with his hands down and Berto stood there and looked at him?

    Comment

    • Skylight
      Banned
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Oct 2008
      • 597
      • 14
      • 33
      • 738

      #3
      Another ****** thread, you're on a roll tonight huh?

      EDIT: I agree I'm just still pissed they robbed Collazo yet again.

      Comment

      • bishop2006
        Pound For Pound
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jan 2006
        • 5301
        • 175
        • 0
        • 12,214

        #4
        I was thinking the same thing,Collazo was getting tagged in the 8th,he barely threw a punch

        Comment

        • boozer52
          Up and Comer
          Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
          • Jun 2007
          • 59
          • 4
          • 0
          • 6,142

          #5
          I am not sure how anyone could give him the 8th round. I have watched the 8th round three times and just can't see it. I think he must daydream or fall asleep in some of the rounds. Although his scoring is suspect at times, he is still entertaining to me.

          Comment

          • Dionyseus
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • May 2004
            • 388
            • 6
            • 4
            • 6,488

            #6
            Lederman was way off tonight, never seen him do that badly. He turns 69 on the 26th of this month, I don't know if age has something to do with it.

            Comment

            • adrsan84
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Nov 2004
              • 2090
              • 91
              • 882
              • 8,690

              #7
              That round was clearly Berto's, That's why his scorecard was wider than it should have been.

              Comment

              • revs1227
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Jul 2007
                • 8040
                • 255
                • 279
                • 15,341

                #8
                i tk the real question is how can anyone give that fight 2 berto ??? **** lederman every knows who rightfully owns that belt

                Comment

                • DLT
                  DMV
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Nov 2004
                  • 17087
                  • 737
                  • 35
                  • 24,277

                  #9
                  Originally posted by B-Ron
                  Not only was his scorecard awful tonight he game Collazo round 8. If you guys watch that round it was one sided with Berto landing all the shots. Collazo hardly landed anything yet Lederman gives him the round? This was Ledermans worst job in years.
                  This is just off the top of my head but I think your talking about round 7. Both round 7 & 8 were carbon copies of eachother but I think he gave 7 to Collazo and 8 to Berto. I actually scored the fight exactly like Lederman "except" for that one round which I think was 7 and thats why I had it 6 rounds to 6

                  Comment

                  • Vladimir303
                    303
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • May 2007
                    • 6067
                    • 398
                    • 276
                    • 12,727

                    #10
                    Hmm interesting. That means Lederman's card should no longer be taken serious.

                    If he gave some close rounds one way or the other fine. They're debatable but nobody can complain.

                    But if this is true, Berto got robbed of a DRAW on Lederman's scorecards. Some people take this guy serious so whatever his card is, that's what people think it is.

                    RIDICULOUS.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP