Who deserved a 50-50 split more: B-Hop against Roy or Hatton against Pac?

[K-Nan]

We all know the "60-40" argument between Roy and B-Hop. And now we all see the problems between Manny and the Hitman. So the questions stands: who is more deserving of the 50-50 split? Hatton in this situation, or B-Hop against Roy?

[-MAKAVELLI-]

roy did...he already won and he was giving hopkins a chance to get even

[larryx]

roy had a win over hopkins..in 2003 id go with roys 60-40 ill whoop yo ass..but in 2006-present 50-50

[Mr. Philadel]

roy had a win over hopkins..in 2003 id go with roys 60-40 ill whoop yo ass..but in 2006-present 50-50

exactly.....Roy was right with his 60-40 talk but NOW its 50-50 all day.

[larryx]

exactly.....Roy was right with his 60-40 talk but NOW its 50-50 all day.

damn st8..you see that interview..roy owned hopkins..he said after i whoop yo ass maybe you could take some spech classes..lol

[MANGLER]

Roy had the w on Bhop, they were talkin bout a rematch.

[K-Nan]

damn st8..you see that interview..roy owned hopkins..he said after i whoop yo ass maybe you could take some spech classes..lol

Haha, that was a classic.

[iron mike tyson]

hop and jones was never much of a draw but jones was p4p number 1 and had the win or hop so jones defo deserved the lions share
pac maybe the p4p number 1 but he dnt draw as big as hatton so hatton deserves parity at least