WBC, WBA or IBF?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • askoe
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Apr 2007
    • 346
    • 14
    • 12
    • 6,542

    #1

    WBC, WBA or IBF?

    I know that holding a title is not the same today as it was back in the days. But which belt is considered the most important today?
    Or are they all equally important/unimportant?
    Last edited by askoe; 01-11-2009, 09:34 AM.
  • gridiron
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Sep 2008
    • 242
    • 11
    • 6
    • 6,341

    #2
    Most prestigious: The Ring belt!

    Comment

    • OnePunch
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • May 2008
      • 9121
      • 1,307
      • 776
      • 2,453,131

      #3
      Originally posted by gridiron
      Most prestigious: The Ring belt!
      you mean the one that doesnt require the champ to EVER fight a mandatory challenger?

      Comment

      • gridiron
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Sep 2008
        • 242
        • 11
        • 6
        • 6,341

        #4
        Originally posted by OnePunch
        you mean the one that doesnt require the champ to EVER fight a mandatory challenger?
        Note, the sanction bodies pretend the others champions don't exist, and don't rank them. Therefore, usually a mandatory challenger to a true champion isn't the most worthy.

        We would see a lot more of #1 vs #2 fights if boxers weren't able to shield their careers behind alphabet titles.

        Comment

        • liam_48@msn.com
          Interim Champion
          Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
          • Apr 2007
          • 706
          • 27
          • 0
          • 6,988

          #5
          THE WBC IS THE BELT! followed shortly by the WBA its simple.

          Comment

          • Ryn0
            Undisputed Champion
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Feb 2007
            • 11139
            • 310
            • 269
            • 20,767

            #6
            did you leave the wbo out on purpose?

            Comment

            • hammerhiem
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • May 2008
              • 4877
              • 129
              • 102
              • 11,163

              #7
              Originally posted by OnePunch
              you mean the one that doesnt require the champ to EVER fight a mandatory challenger?
              yeah because mandetory's haven't become a total laughing stock at all have they?

              LHW Mandetory fighters: WBC Silvano Branco, WBA: Vyacheslav Uzelkov IBF:Travoris Cloud.

              Are you ****ing kidding me? Not single one ranked top 10 by Ring, and i picked the weight at random before looking at who was the challengers because i ****ing knew it would be a joke no matter what division i picked.

              Comment

              • gridiron
                Contender
                Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                • Sep 2008
                • 242
                • 11
                • 6
                • 6,341

                #8
                Originally posted by liam_48@msn.com
                THE WBC IS THE BELT! followed shortly by the WBA its simple.
                Explain why?

                Comment

                • gridiron
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Sep 2008
                  • 242
                  • 11
                  • 6
                  • 6,341

                  #9






                  Comment

                  • Steak
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Aug 2006
                    • 10713
                    • 509
                    • 268
                    • 17,902

                    #10
                    Originally posted by gridiron
                    Note, the sanction bodies pretend the others champions don't exist, and don't rank them. Therefore, usually a mandatory challenger to a true champion isn't the most worthy.

                    We would see a lot more of #1 vs #2 fights if boxers weren't able to shield their careers behind alphabet titles.
                    excellent point.

                    honestly, if the alphabet belts actually bothered to rank the other champions, the belts wouldnt be all that bad.

                    that said, the RING belt can be garbage sometimes too. A lot of the time the guy thats ranked #1 is the real best in the division, and not the champion. and thats throughout boxing history too.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP