Morales : Hatton Will Beat Pacquiao

[larryx]

is morales ass sore????

[dans]

Did anyone think that he might be right. Maybe Hatton is too strong at 140? I mean Pac did beat De La Hoya, but at 147 De La Hoya was very weak. Hatton is very strong for a JWW and I agree with Morales on this. Also, maybe Erik just doesn't think that Pacman is as good as everyone says. True, his is probably biased, but I respect the words of the only man to ever beat a prime Pacquiao. I mean Morales didn't have a controversial win or a close loss like Marquez, he soundly beat Pacquiao and I think has him figured out better than anyone. The reason Erik lost the 2nd and 3rd Pacman fights is he was a shot fighter.

[Mr. Ryan]

Translation: Hatton would murder Erik Morales.

[Mr. Ryan]

Did anyone think that he might be right. Maybe Hatton is too strong at 140? I mean Pac did beat De La Hoya, but at 147 De La Hoya was very weak. Hatton is very strong for a JWW and I agree with Morales on this. Also, maybe Erik just doesn't think that Pacman is as good as everyone says. True, his is probably biased, but I respect the words of the only man to ever beat a prime Pacquiao. I mean Morales didn't have a controversial win or a close loss like Marquez, he soundly beat Pacquiao and I think has him figured out better than anyone. The reason Erik lost the 2nd and 3rd Pacman fights is he was a shot fighter.

You could also say that Morales was a bigger fighter at 130, since it was Pacquiao's first time fighting at that weight. By the time the rematch happened, Pacquiao had already fought another fight at that weight.

But I agree, Hatton is a very strong junior welterweight, I just don't think he has much left personally. And don't talk to me about the Malignaggi fight, he was never a threat to Hatton.

[RL_GMA]

He also said Oscar was gonna KO Pac...

[QUISQUEYA]

Morales acts like a ***** when it comes to Pacquiao...

Idk why he has such a problem with him. He beat him in the most pure of ways to Morales. He didn't run, he just straight outfought him... so I'm not sure why Morales is so bitter.

Because Erik was well past his prime for the 2nd and 3rd. It would have been great to see that trilogy when Erik was peak, as Pac was.

But Pac couldn't (and SHOULDN'T) have to fight trilogies or multi-fights with Barrera, Marquez, AND Erik all in their primes. That is too much to ask of anyone.

[larryx]

who cares what morales thinks any damn way

[KILLA RIGHT]

He's friends with manny i think this is his honest opinion

[MOREBASS]

Because Erik was well past his prime for the 2nd and 3rd. It would have been great to see that trilogy when Erik was peak, as Pac was.

But Pac couldn't (and SHOULDN'T) have to fight trilogies or multi-fights with Barrera, Marquez, AND Erik all in their primes. That is too much to ask of anyone.

How convinient that he was only 'past his prime' for the 2nd & 3rd fight, the ones he lost.

Just because someone loses, doesn't automatically mean they are 'well past prime'

You guys on here do way too much with the 'past prime' stuff. The fighters themselves have less excuses than some of you.

Besides, I would argue that Pacquiao was nowhere near his peak when he fought El Terrible.

[-MAKAVELLI-]

did Manny cut off all of Erik's endorsement deals in philippines? lol