Do you understand how important Mayweather vs Pacquiao is?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Kendo
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Mar 2006
    • 641
    • 23
    • 0
    • 6,951

    #11
    Originally posted by Ishy Aytan
    This is the fight of 2009 that we as fight fans all want...

    Real boxing fans want to see this fight... Like ive said on many occasions, the fans over here in the UK are ONLY fans WHEN a British fighter is fighting, which shows their ignorance towards the sport.

    This is the fight we all want to see... One good thing about DLH is that he opened up doors to a whole lot of new intersting matches, because he fought Pacquiao.
    My thing is and i agree with you. If you do not want to see this fight your are dumb. This fight like someone said on this would define the century of boxing. I agree if promoted right would be the very huge and prolly bigger than DLH fight. actually if you cant get hype for a fight that pins the number 1 and 2 PFP king pins together you cant get hype for anything. someone needs to tell floyd that another hatton fight wont do him justice. he beat him once and beat him bad. floyd needs manny and i think right now manny needs floyd.

    Comment

    • -MAKAVELLI-
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Aug 2008
      • 50080
      • 3,580
      • 2,792
      • 169,000

      #12
      not arguing the magnitude of this fight but TBH, pacquiao doesnt need floyd...

      Comment

      • S.G.
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • May 2008
        • 9412
        • 296
        • 635
        • 16,360

        #13
        i will be so depressed if this fight doesn't happen in 09

        Comment

        • DiegoFuego
          Ask my dad, I'm GAY!
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Jan 2005
          • 17339
          • 1,403
          • 586
          • 24,657

          #14
          In terms of significance it would be the most important fight in boxing history since #1 and #2 across the entire sport have never fought. The only other time we came close to that was Roy vs. Hopkins.

          Comment

          • -MAKAVELLI-
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Aug 2008
            • 50080
            • 3,580
            • 2,792
            • 169,000

            #15
            Originally posted by DiegoFuego
            In terms of significance it would be the most important fight in boxing history since #1 and #2 across the entire sport have never fought. The only other time we came close to that was Roy vs. Hopkins.



            hopkins?


            i say roy vs toney was a more significant p4p matchup

            Comment

            • DiegoFuego
              Ask my dad, I'm GAY!
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Jan 2005
              • 17339
              • 1,403
              • 586
              • 24,657

              #16
              Originally posted by Makavelli
              hopkins?


              i say roy vs toney was a more significant p4p matchup
              Roy vs. Toney could be argued to be #1 vs. #2 but I seem to remember most people thinking Toney or Pernell was #1 and Roy was 3rd or lower.

              Comment

              • DiegoFuego
                Ask my dad, I'm GAY!
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Jan 2005
                • 17339
                • 1,403
                • 586
                • 24,657

                #17
                And I was talking about 2002 when Roy was #1 and Hopkins was #2 and it fell through

                Comment

                • -MAKAVELLI-
                  Banned
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Aug 2008
                  • 50080
                  • 3,580
                  • 2,792
                  • 169,000

                  #18
                  Originally posted by DiegoFuego
                  Roy vs. Toney could be argued to be #1 vs. #2 but I seem to remember most people thinking Toney or Pernell was #1 and Roy was 3rd or lower.
                  i might have to look that one up...from what i remember it was roy and pernell at 1 and 2 with toney at 3....

                  Comment

                  • DiegoFuego
                    Ask my dad, I'm GAY!
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Jan 2005
                    • 17339
                    • 1,403
                    • 586
                    • 24,657

                    #19
                    Originally posted by Makavelli
                    i might have to look that one up...from what i remember it was roy and pernell at 1 and 2 with toney at 3....
                    that makes no sense. Toney was undefeated and a 2-weight champ. Roy hadn't fought anyone but Hopkins before that.

                    Comment

                    • AKATheMack
                      Unreasonably Logical
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Nov 2004
                      • 11155
                      • 430
                      • 285
                      • 19,179

                      #20
                      Id much rather see Mayweather-Trinidad tho.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP