Do you agree with RAP decision?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Vasyl’s dad
    He said no rematch
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Mar 2008
    • 23510
    • 1,120
    • 1,945
    • 50,072

    #1

    Do you agree with RAP decision?

    To not make Margarito Mosley for the Ring belt?
    8
    Yes, I agree it should not be for the Ring title
    75.00%
    6
    No, I do not agree that it should not be for the Ring title
    25.00%
    2
  • mellow_mood
    BORICUA 110%
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jun 2008
    • 14133
    • 297
    • 614
    • 20,603

    #2
    Originally posted by El Gallo Negro!
    To not make Margarito Mosley for the Ring belt?
    I do agree....

    margo belongs to that fight..

    mosley doesnt.


    paul williams names.. wont let margo take that spot until the face each other again.


    i got margo

    Comment

    • Ray*
      Be safe!!!
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jul 2005
      • 44867
      • 1,654
      • 1,608
      • 558,890

      #3
      You have to agree with that decision, The williams situation is making it difficult to make this fight a ring belt fight.

      Comment

      • Squabbles94806
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Oct 2008
        • 2408
        • 54
        • 104
        • 2,886

        #4
        No belts on the line? *****, now Mosely's definately going to lose.

        Here's the prediction for the dramatic escalade of 2009. *ahem*

        Mosely loses to Margarito

        Margarito and Cotto fight, for the belt

        Cotto wins

        Mosely fights Cotto, for the belt

        Mosely wins title. Mosely loses title.

        Mosely champion. Of course this isin speculation. It all depends how bad Margarito beats him up. Of if Cotto can even get to Margarito.

        Fcuk it....Margarito's gonna smash on all of them. If he wants to keep that belt that is.

        Comment

        • adrsan84
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Nov 2004
          • 2090
          • 91
          • 882
          • 8,690

          #5
          I think it should be for the ring title, It's number 1 vs number 3, and he already beat number 2, it would make sense. I can see why Williams is considered when arguing no, but the ring has him as a super welter, so they should be consistent. rank him at 147 as well, or make this for the ring title.
          Last edited by adrsan84; 12-26-2008, 02:32 PM. Reason: clarification.

          Comment

          • hookoutofhell
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Dec 2007
            • 2752
            • 82
            • 52
            • 9,101

            #6
            damn titles, they should just have a WW tounament, theres enough good names in there: marg, cotto, williams and sugar shane are the big names but theres also berto, collazo and clottey.

            i reckon it should be for the ring magazine belt, i would have thought it would be what with a GBP fighter in there. marg is the no.1 in the division, not by much but he has done enough to be ranked as the top dog imo. therefore any fight with him in it should be for the ring belt.

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP