I am making this poll only because i saw it in another thread and to add to the ****** idea of making polls about pac vs all time greats. But then again, maybe its not that ******, some of yall comparing pac to henry armstrong just because HBO did it, thus its fair to see how hed fair against all time greats.
Whitaker Vs Pac @ 140
Collapse
-
I am making this poll only because i saw it in another thread and to add to the ****** idea of making polls about pac vs all time greats. But then again, maybe its not that ******, some of yall comparing pac to henry armstrong just because HBO did it, thus its fair to see how hed fair against all time greats.Comment
-
dude pacquiao beats anyone at welterweight from any era... this is a walk in the park for pacman.. nyahha...
but seriously... whitaker would school his ass, i dont understand why this piece of **** is getting so much credit for beating a dehydrated dlh who was actually 143 during training...now they all got the nerve to actually believe he can beat mayweather.. *** off... ****** pinoys.
make the poll public to expose the ******s..Comment
-
******? When you think about it though its not. Pac is being called an alltime great. Matching pac against other all time greats measures his ability all time. It brings down the board how? At least its actually about boxing, not filled with any pac hate at all, and on top of that, brings debate and discussion. The ring had a pacman Vs. feature i think 2 years ago between him and other featherweights. did that bring down the credibility of the mag that they had pac losing against the majority of them?Comment
-
Comment
-
as much as i cant stand that guy, he is right, trinidad was the first fight whitaker truely lost with no debate and he was long past it by then. however he didint get robbed against DLH, it was a close fight if you have actually seen it (not you).Comment
Comment