Manny Pacquiao-Antonio Margarito, Arum Says Never

[aether]

Even still, Roach is a shakin ass spineless rat..

lol He protects Manny more then Manny Steward tried to protect Hamed. The only difference between the two, is that Steward couldn't maneuver Hamed through a bunch of weak weight classes and pick ideal fighters for Nasim. Steward thought Barrea was the lesser of two evils between Marquez and Barrera, he ended up ultimately payin the price...

Roach on the other hand, has a never ending supply of lame fighters. lol When he's not baitin Oscar to shatter his body, he's still got lames like Hatton.






And to be honest, if all you ****in lame ass englandites never showed up...lmao Hatton would have never got put on the scene to begin with, because everyone knows Margarito was more worthy of facin Mayweather then Ricky the lame chin Hatton. And Marg would have made a better fight out of it then Ricky. No way Marg ends up lookin like a bird by way of a check hook...






All in all, boxing is upside down right down. Once Paq and Calzaghe leave, I think that will spark a new interest in boxing. Because all people see are these guys who beat on older guys, no one with the exception of Margarito and Cotto are willing to give us some raw fights between two prime ****ers.

a big edit: I forgot about what Marquez and Vasquez gave us....

still have'nt recovered from the pac beatings huh... take it easy. pac will lose someday. hopefully to a mexican...

[andrew14]

ahahah!

to all pacman haters expecially mayan sun, ferocity and xcaret.

pacman is not superman and calling him chicken. if marg is the only way to beat

pac. your a moron.

maybe marg can pick williams thats a good fight for him than avoiding him.

[ferocity]

to all pacman haters expecially mayan sun, ferocity and xcaret.

pacman is not superman and calling him chicken. if marg is the only way to beat

pac. your a moron.

maybe marg can pick williams thats a good fight for him than avoiding him.

Im glad you not over rating Pac.

Pac has a **** load of competiton he left behind from 130-135 and i've said this countless times.

Pac fights old men, Hatton will bring him back to reality.

[e=m(c*c)]

i say floyd gayweather jr. fight margo!

[andrew14]

fool

Im glad you not over rating Pac.

Pac has a **** load of competiton he left behind from 130-135 and i've said this countless times.

Pac fights old men, Hatton will bring him back to reality.

pac fought a 29 yr old barrera. barrera is old that time.

pac fought a 28 yr old morales. morales is old that time.

pac fought a 35 yr old marquez. marquez is in his prime.

ahahah! nice counting numbers.

[SceneSpectator!]

Margarito would **** on Pacquiao. If you don't think so then make the fight ask Chicken Pacquiao to take the fight if you think its going to be competitive. Either Margarito kicks the **** out of him or Pac is competitive and if he's competitive why not take the fight. So stop the bull****, Margarito would hurt Pac badly.

And when the payday is good Margarito will move up. Just as Pac moved up cause the payday is good. But he did keep moving up from the 106 cause he was out growing his boy body and he was forced to move up, but his fans will say its because he chose too now its because he had to. Remember when people said Pac is a natural featherweight, lol, yeah sure, and for 10 bucks i can buy New York.

So let all the egos go, and have some humility, Pac would get his ass knocked out against Margarito. IF you think other wise then shut your trap and ask for the fight.

you're talking more bitter than logical! Manny is competitive against Marg, but for some business reason, arum would not put two of his best fighters just to ruin the credibility of the other. Marg have so many potential good opponents ahead, so through with Pacman. Pacman can go down as low as SFW to face the bests within those divisions and Marg can do the same from 147 to 154, so why should arum put them together? Maybe, some other time when that time will be right for them both to face each other, but definitely not now.

[SceneSpectator!]

Pac fights old men, Hatton will bring him back to reality.

You're wrong.. and again after you're superfluous optimism for ODLH to win against Pacman! 140 is the right and natural domain for Pacman!

[SceneSpectator!]

PAC is doing all he can to avoid JMM everyone knows he's running from the guy. How can u not fight a trilogy when the first two were so contraversal

Yes, Pacquiao - JMM 1 was controversial after one of the judges admitted his erroneous scoring that should favor Pacquiao to win, not just a draw. In Pacquiao - JMM 2 to where Pacman won by split decision will just cement the reality that Pacman should be the winner in 1 because if Pacman deseves winning in 2 to where JMM KD once, why not in 1 when JMM KD 3x???! Therefore Pacman won two times against JMM no matter how he fought hard! Well, Pacman as we all knew is not running from any one, he can always put a good fight anyone you put in front of him, but his handler maneuvering his career is cautious and focused. Pacquiao - JMM 3 is good and what I am wishing to happen, but then you can not blame his handler if he would consider to window shops among bests fighters from SFW, LW and JWW for better match up and for better money can give. Afterall, a new match-up is I believes what majority of the boxing fans wanted to see.

[pistol whip]

pac fought a 29 yr old barrera. barrera is old that time.

pac fought a 28 yr old morales. morales is old that time.

pac fought a 35 yr old marquez. marquez is in his prime.

ahahah! nice counting numbers.

Do you even watch Boxing ? Or are you legally blind?

Morales and Barrera were face first pressure fighters and Marquez has and always been a Boxer Puncher who was never the kinda fighter who took 2 punches to land 1. Barrera turned into a boxer later in his career because his body was shot but he only had moderate success after that.

The point im making is Boxer punchers have longer careers than pressure fighters.

[pistol whip]

Yes, Pacquiao - JMM 1 was controversial after one of the judges admitted his erroneous scoring that should favor Pacquiao to win, not just a draw.

No it was a Draw officially and thats all that counts. In the years after that fight I have read Zero reports on that supposed error but I have read about the judge making a mistake in the De La Hoya fight against mayweather which would have given De La Hoya a Draw. So where did you hear this Bull**** from anyways?