Why is it that....

[geronimot3]

manny pacquiao is considered a four time world champ, when he is a five time world champ...

[gibo]

manny pacquiao is considered a four time world champ, when he is a five time world champ...

ALSO ASK WHY odlh IS MENTIONED AS A "10 TIME" WORLD CHAMPION?? ARE THEY COUNTING WBO.IBF,IBA??? SERIOUSLY....PADDED...

[DiegoFuego]

Pacquiao never won a title at 126. He beat the recognized champ Barrera but Barrera had given his belt up beforehand. He also got robbed when they gave him a draw vs. Marquez despite clearly winning

[geronimot3]

Padded is the right word. The tko over mab to take the ring belt at 126 dot count...thats one of his most important fights and what open his ****in doors..you feel me?

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

They are not counting the ring as a belt. So Pac have the WBC flyweight, The IBF Super BantamWeight, the WBC Super FeatherWeight and the WBC Lightweight. He didnt won a title at 126!!!!

And for Oscar yeap, they are counting all the alphabet bellts!!!!!

[DiegoFuego]

Padded is the right word. The tko over mab to take the ring belt at 126 dot count...thats one of his most important fights and what open his ****in doors..you feel me?

i agree it's BS but that's how they count titles

**** boxing

[geronimot3]

Aight thanks for clearing that **** up...**** is whack but thanks bruh..

[MANGLER]

Made no sense to deny him credit for the MAB win, which was for the Ring belt.

[miron_lang]

If Pacquiao is not a former Featherweight champion then

Joe Calzaghe is not a light heavyweight champion.


simple.


Pacquiao 5 Division champion

Eusebio Pedroza-----------------Hamed-Barrera-Pacquiao

[pistol whip]

Pacquiao never won a title at 126. He beat the recognized champ Barrera but Barrera had given his belt up beforehand. He also got robbed when they gave him a draw vs. Marquez despite clearly winning

Beating the recognized champ is the only real championship that matters. I think you got things backwards.