brits are taught to not go out taking risks....

[billionaire]

that is the difference between brits and americans...the famous american fighters 90s-2000 era usually stay around well after there primes and risk their legacies....gatti mosley hopkins yones holyfield tyson

joe calzaghe dont blame him so much....hes only doing what the 2 best known 90s british boxers did...lennox lewis went out with his lucky victory rather then risk losing to vitali and his legacy being drowned....prince naseem chose to get fat and retire rather than take the hard road on a comeback trail....now everyone thinks he was one of the best when he only fought 1 great fighter

[Wales08]

Americans love money.

[squealpiggy]

brits are taught to not go out taking risks....

This is the single ******est statement I have read on NSB and seriously there is some competition for you there. "Brits" are "taught" not to take risks? Utterly preposterous.

that is the difference between brits and americans...the famous american fighters 90s-2000 era usually stay around well after there primes and risk their legacies....gatti mosley hopkins yones holyfield tyson

You really think Tyson would carry on fighting and get knocked out as a fat forty year old by Kevin McBride if he wasn't ****ing broke? You think Gatti "took risks" because he liked getting his ass kicked? It's for the money, that's the ONLY reason fighters stay in the game well past their prime. Oh and Hopkins is still beating prime elite fighters. Your theory doesn't apply to him.

joe calzaghe dont blame him so much....hes only doing what the 2 best known 90s british boxers did..

Frank Bruno? Nigel Benn? Chris Eubank? Just who were these two famous souls?

.lennox lewis went out with his lucky victory rather then risk losing to vitali and his legacy being drowned....prince naseem chose to get fat and retire rather than take the hard road on a comeback trail

Oh the two "most well known" British fighters of the nineties happen to be the ONLY ONES WHO SUPPORT YOUR NONARGUMENT.

You're a tool.

[S A M U R A I]

Classify, categorize and label and entire country at once? Well done. That's fascism.



100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

[S A M U R A I]

Americans love money.

As does the thread starter. Look at the user name.



100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

[Dan...]

Horrible thread. Horrible.

[_Hunter_]

Hello Jizzpak

[Wales08]

As does the thread starter. Look at the user name.

Haha didnt notice that until you said.

Ture thought example is Lewis being offered 65-100m to fight again and he is sticking to his words and is happy enough.

[Addition]

The thread starter isn't the smartest tool in the box. You really shouldn't be anywhere near a PC.

[billionaire]

This is the single ******est statement I have read on NSB and seriously there is some competition for you there. "Brits" are "taught" not to take risks? Utterly preposterous.



You really think Tyson would carry on fighting and get knocked out as a fat forty year old by Kevin McBride if he wasn't ****ing broke? You think Gatti "took risks" because he liked getting his ass kicked? It's for the money, that's the ONLY reason fighters stay in the game well past their prime. Oh and Hopkins is still beating prime elite fighters. Your theory doesn't apply to him.



Frank Bruno? Nigel Benn? Chris Eubank? Just who were these two famous souls?



Oh the two "most well known" British fighters of the nineties happen to be the ONLY ONES WHO SUPPORT YOUR NONARGUMENT.

You're a tool.

nigel benn and chris eubanks went out getting kod ova n ova...lennox would still be getting paid alot more if he took the vitali rematch back then, everyone cares about money except for crums like you....naseem and lennox didnt want to risk being like them...i was told personally....