Kessler Vs Froch February 28
Collapse
-
Steve Kim reported it here
Comment
-
Then it depends on who you believe.
Dan Rafael posted after it was brought up.
JKGaucho (DC): Why would HBO be interested in Dawson vs. Tarver II? First wasn't a great fight and did terrible business. Tarver will only be older. A wasted date if that fight is made.
SportsNation Dan Rafael: They're not interested in it to my knowledge.
And he mentioned it again here.
Comment
-
HBO has been turning down more fights recently, I think they are now playing hardball with the promoters that's why next year is looking so good. I don't see how they will be able to justify paying for Dawson vs Tarver 2, like I said it makes zero sense.Then it depends on who you believe.
And he mentioned it again here.
http://maxboxing.com/Kim/Kim121108.aspComment
-
The fight doesn't make sense but some fights don't, the fight would be better than something like Pavlik-Lockett, as I said, maybe they'll try to push Calzaghe-Dawson, although it would be great if they would push for Calzaghe-Dawson with Kessler-Dawson.Comment
-
I love your avatar, That is some funny stuff cant help but lol,Comment
-
I'm not so sure Kessler is going to be Froch's next fight. He's desperate for a fight with Taylor, that it's in Arum's hand to take it. If Taylor avoids the fight again, then that would leave Karo Murat as Froch's mandatory.
Froch has stated that Taylor and Kessler are the top men besides him in the division, so he would want either, but there is no news from Hennesey (Froch's promoter), that Palle has shown any interest, so if it was to happen it would be in the fall of 2009.
Also, Winky has been so inactive that Kessler would probably knock him out. Winky needs a tune up before going into the fight, which would leave Kessler's mandatory as Perdoma? Yes, i've never heard of him too.Comment
-

Comment