Its a shame Cunningham-Adamek wasn't on the PPV

**flipbjefrox** · 12-11-2008, 10:16 PM

it's ok... i think this card is a great step towards moving boxing to mainstream channel. it's rare to see championship fights in basic cable. But tonight we saw 2 competitive championship fight

**Kball15** · 12-11-2008, 10:17 PM

I disagree

i think guys like Cunningham and Adamek, who give their all in every fight, deserve their own fight in their own arena and in front of their own fans.

**DuranKOdMyHorse** · 12-11-2008, 10:18 PM

Just be thankful you're not in the UK.

I dont think it was on here at all.

**billionaire** · 12-11-2008, 10:18 PM

Originally posted by MikeBrew328

It's true. These are the kind of fights fans need to see. That was a great fight, a great matchup. Not that garbage we saw on DLH-Pacquiao. If only the casual fan saw that, boxing would get so much more attention. But no, its on channel 146 and only us hardcores saw it.

shutthe****up

**insipiens** · 12-11-2008, 10:20 PM

I think it was better that I got to watch for free.

Boxing fans are weird. They'd rather pay than watch for free?

**-Antonio-** · 12-11-2008, 10:21 PM

This was free man.

A lot of people watch Versus too. I know people who watch WEC all day on Versus.

**MikeBrew328** · 12-11-2008, 10:21 PM

Originally posted by billionaire

shutthe****up

Not until you fix your pound 4 pound list.

**MANGLER** · 12-11-2008, 10:48 PM

Why would anybody want any fight to be on PPV? Hell, even HBO and Showtime fights cost extra money since they're premium stations. VS is ****in basic cable, we pretty much got to see a FOTY candidate for free. **** PPV!!!

**warp1432** · 12-11-2008, 10:49 PM

I think he means Pacquiao-De La Hoya. He has a point. More people probably paid for DLH-Pacquiao then saw the VS card

Its a shame Cunningham-Adamek wasn't on the PPV