Decision that were not robberys, but they were just plain wrong

[Dynamite Kid]

Terrible... seems strange you would make a thread like this, considering I know you know that someone is going to say Johnson-Dawson...

I can't imagine you ever thought for a moment that this thread would conclude without that getting mentioned.

Morales-Barrera I
Barrera-Morales II

Yeah, but it makes no difference to me im not over sensitive, i hope not anway

people have mentioned Halger v Leonard etc already so

[The Texican]

How soon we forget the Andrade-Bute fiasco. It wasn't a robbery because Bute was winning on the cards, but he should've been counted out or ref stoppaged because, well, we've all seen it.

[Fox McCloud]

Yeah, but it makes no difference to me im not over sensitive, i hope not anway

people have mentioned Halger v Leonard etc already so

Word... good to see someone else on this forum who doesn't start a thread, hoping that someone says their fighter so they can start a huge argument about it...

I think we've talked about Morales-Espadas I before, and I'll leave it at that...

There is nothing more irritating than someone who comes into a thread like this, doesn't add a fight that falls under the criteria of the topic and just argues about their favorite fighter.

A Mayweather fan will quote whoever said Castillo I in a few posts and talk about how Mayweather easily won that fight, easy work, one armed, etc. etc. etc.

Props to you for being one of the few boxing fans on the site, and not fighter fans.

[Dynamite Kid]

Word... good to see someone else on this forum who doesn't start a thread, hoping that someone says their fighter so they can start a huge argument about it...

I think we've talked about Morales-Espadas I before, and I'll leave it at that...

There is nothing more irritating than someone who comes into a thread like this, doesn't add a fight that falls under the criteria of the topic and just argues about their favorite fighter.

A Mayweather fan will quote whoever said Castillo I in a few posts and talk about how Mayweather easily won that fight, easy work, one armed, etc. etc. etc.

Props to you for being one of the few boxing fans on the site, and not fighter fans.

Cheers, thats not me DWiens421

I think Dawson is potentially the best fighter out there at the momenet if his chin can hold up which it may not do against the bigger hitters.

I do like his style though the movement and speed flashy combos etc

[Fox McCloud]

Cheers, thats not me DWiens421

I think Dawson is potentially the best fighter out there at the momenet if his chin can hold up which it may not do against the bigger hitters.

I do like his style though the movement and speed flashy combos etc

The chin is a question mark, and to be honest, I think he gets hit just a bit too much for a slickster...

He reminds me of Andre Berto...

It's a drastic comparison, but... too much offensive concentration, and not enough defensive concentration in my mind.

I'll bet you are a fan of Bradley too, aren't you?

[El Dominicano]

Nice thread idea.

Pernell Whitaker vs DLH
Ike vs DLH
SSM vs DLH 2
B-Hop vs Calzaghe

[Fox McCloud]

I'll add Johnson-Tarver I...

I was pretty surprised that Johnson got that decision. I thought Tarver took that fight going away.

[Nu Jerzey Devil]

Hopkins Calzaghe. And Calzaghe Manfredo.

[Dynamite Kid]

The chin is a question mark, and to be honest, I think he gets hit just a bit too much for a slickster...

He reminds me of Andre Berto...

It's a drastic comparison, but... too much offensive concentration, and not enough defensive concentration in my mind.

I'll bet you are a fan of Bradley too, aren't you?

I think Dawson's problem is not that he is bad defensively i think its more a case of when you are 6'3 its hard to be illusive because you are a bigger target any shot over the top coming from underneath is going to be difficult to see let alone slip

IMO the best defence a tall fighter can have is the Lewis,Wladimir's type defence not trying to roll and slip shots the way Dawson like to do

Yep im a fan of Bradley aswelll how did you know besides the sig ?

[Fox McCloud]

I think Dawson's problem is not that he is bad defensively i think its more a case of when you are 6'3 its hard to be illusive because you are a bigger target any shot over the top coming from underneath is going to be difficult to see let alone slip

IMO the best defence a tall fighter can have is the Lewis,Wladimir's type defence not trying to roll and slip shots the way Dawson like to do

Yep im a fan of Bradley aswelll how did you know besides the sig ?

I didn't even notice him on your sig...

Just because he fights the way Dawson would if he didn't make mistakes IMO...

He looked damn near perfect against Cherry last time out.