Pacquiao owns 3 unexpected no mas' againts hofamers
Collapse
-
wtf? It's the complete opposite you moronthats a fabrication by delusion Pac haters. Morales was still prime. He was 29 which is the same age that pac is now and pac has been in more punishing fights than Morales has. don't confuse lightweights for heavyweights. Lightweights stay in their primes for alot longer than heavyweights do.Comment
-
Comment
-
Your last hero Lousito Espinosa must have quit in his prime against Augie Sanchez. Jesus Salud another Pinoy quiter against Bobby Boy Verlardez both Pinoys quiting in there prime. And lets not forget Donaire when he quit against Vic Darchniyin, how some small midget pinoys can talk **** about someone quiting is un****enbelivable.Comment
-
it's all in the past baby biatch like when u used to box in the past but now ur nothing but a fat puto with no life. pac is number right now biatch. face it mexicans dont like dela hoya well he just **** on u. u guys are in the lower bottom right now. when are u guys going to get the limelight again now that the only mexican guy who is popular lost to a midget. dela hoya is a mexican blood but americanize who can bring it. the next popular ones after pacquiao are blacks and whites. u mexicans are in the bottom. hahahahahaa!!! pwned instead of maragarito being the next superstar dela hoya ignored him. where is he now? no big fights? NO MAS BIATCH.Your last hero Lousito Espinosa must have quit in his prime against Augie Sanchez. Jesus Salud another Pinoy quiter against Bobby Boy Verlardez both Pinoys quiting in there prime. And lets not forget Donaire when he quit against Vic Darchniyin, how some small midget pinoys can talk **** about someone quiting is un****enbelivable.Comment
-
I tend to disagree... look at Lennox Lewis, Bernard Hopkins, Joe Calzaghe and other fighters in the upper weight classes who have ruled their classes in the mid to upper 30s... Its not as common in the smaller classes because Lighterweight guys age quicker then Heavier guys... and chronological age is not the same as ring age. Morales had much more punishing fights then Pacquiao did at the same age (29) cause Morales made every fight a brawl... Pacquaio has at least been trying to incorporate some boxing into his matches (Diaz fight). Lastly Morales was shot going into the second pacquaio fight because he looked shot against Zahir Raheem the fight before. Just like Oscar v. Pacquaio, Morales couldn't " pull the trigger" against Raheem but was luck Raheem is not much of a puncher!thats a fabrication by delusion Pac haters. Morales was still prime. He was 29 which is the same age that pac is now and pac has been in more punishing fights than Morales has. don't confuse lightweights for heavyweights. Lightweights stay in their primes for alot longer than heavyweights do.Comment
-
You only wish you could be a boxer through Pacs fights lmao. You're a never was, i at least had the balls to try something you can never say.it's all in the past baby biatch like when u used to box in the past but now ur nothing but a fat puto with no life. pac is number right now biatch. face it mexicans dont like dela hoya well he just **** on u. u guys are in the lower bottom right now. when are u guys going to get the limelight again now that the only mexican guy who is popular lost to a midget. dela hoya is a mexican blood but americanize who can bring it. the next popular ones after pacquiao are blacks and whites. u mexicans are in the bottom. hahahahahaa!!! pwned instead of maragarito being the next superstar dela hoya ignored him. where is he now? no big fights? NO MAS BIATCH.
And we are the ones at the bottom, lmao. Name me 5 Champions that are Filliopenes?
Before Pac there was Lousito Espinosa, lmfao!!!!
Comment
Comment