Will it be Kessler vs. Winky Wright in March?

[The Hammer]

Very weak response, mt102879.

Better turn it over to Danc1984.

[Dan...]

And this was my answer, mt102879:

Let's get this straight: if you hate a fighter, you'll say all the opponents he's beaten were "old" or "shot" regardless of their age. After all, since you believe that fighter is inferior, in your mind there's no way the fighter you hate could beat anyone any good UNLESS he is old and/or shot!

But if you like a fighter, their opponents are never "old" or "shot" regardless of how much they have slowed down or what age they are! When your favorites like Dawson beat old fighters like Tarver you'll say those are great wins on his resume!!


mt102879, you and Danc1984 hate white fighters and will use whatever you can to discredit them.

So keep ganging up, you cowardly scumbags. You are becoming like a tag team - but too weak to fight on your own.

You can say any fighter is shot at any age, or say he is prime at any age, but it doesn't necessarily mean they are or are not. It's just your OPINION, and your opinions are always slanted against European boxers and their fans.

Most of us come here to discuss boxing, but you two just come here to discredit European fighters and antagonize their fans. I never see you score fights on line, or discuss fights when they are on, or post in the videos section.

Now if Joe Calzaghe has retired, I'm sure Kessler will be receiving a lot more hate from you two.

What? I don't score the fights while they are happening or post in the videos section so I'm not a true boxing fan? I download fights from the video section all the time. We don't get the majority of the fights in Europe or the US out here in Australia so I generally wait until the next day and dl them. How can I score a fight if I can't watch it live?

Kessler receiving hate from me? Since when was this happening? I'm a Kessler fan, there is noone at 168 I would go for against Kess right now. Calzaghe doesn't receive hate from me either. I have regularly given him credit on a great career.

You are a joke. There is barely a poster on here, aside from your racist buddies, who places any value on your opinion. Everyone just pretty much laughs at you. You are a clown.

[daggum]

tunney may i see your current top 10 p4p list. i think i know who will be on it...................

[Dan...]

Dead set, Tunney's cat pics in his avatar are his only redeeming feature.

[The Hammer]

Danc1984, you and mt102879 are fast becoming the biggest jokes on here.

90% of your posts you're either discrediting a European fighter, or harassing me (accusing me of being a racist, insulting, etc).

mt102879 mainly comes on here these days to harass me (call me racist, goes on about some other pro-white website, insults me, accuse me of being sexually insecure, etc.). One day though, he did get into a discussion about 1980s sneakers.

Other people have better reasons for posting here, and unlike you guys they are real boxing fans.

[Dan...]

Danc1984, you and mt102879 are fast becoming the biggest jokes on here.

90% of your posts you're either discrediting a European fighter, or harassing me (accusing me of being a racist, insulting, etc).

mt102879 mainly comes on here these days to harass me (call me racist, goes on about some other pro-white website, insults me, accuse me of being sexually insecure, etc.). One day though, he did get into a discussion about 1980s sneakers.

Other people have better reasons for posting here, and unlike you guys they are real boxing fans.

ROFL. Ok dude whatever, would you mind chucking me back on ignore please?

[βetamax]

Very weak response, mt102879.

Better turn it over to Danc1984.

Dude, I've tried giving a respectful counter argument on more than one occasion in the past. You don't listen. When your argument gets shattered you attack the person's character to rationalize they don't know what they're talking about. You call them "gay", "racist", "paranoid", etc. What you do is the definition of an ad hominem attack.

Take a look in the mirror:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

[daggum]

i'm new to this fun little debate but tunney are you claiming roy jones is not shot? it's universally recognized that he is very shot. i mean look at him he just stands there and takes punches.also johnson and tarver are not shot as you can see by their performances in the ring. old yes but not shot. tarver just dominated woods for the ibf title. roy jones hasn't been fighting on the world title level for 5 years.

[The Hammer]

i'm new to this fun little debate but tunney are you claiming roy jones is not shot? it's universally recognized that he is very shot. i mean look at him he just stands there and takes punches.also johnson and tarver are not shot as you can see by their performances in the ring. old yes but not shot. tarver just dominated woods for the ibf title. roy jones hasn't been fighting on the world title level for 5 years.

Three against one isn't fair.

No, I can see Jones is definitely faded. But Joe has seen better days too, before his hand was broken the second time.

[The Hammer]

mt102879, you are too weak to fight on you own. You always attack when Danc1984 is already arguing...

But no, what YOU do is the definition of an ad hominem attack.

Take a look in the mirror:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

Rather than argue the point, you just start making accusations about racism and claiming the fans of European fighters are all ****s who post on white supremacist websites. THAT'S AN AD HOMINEM ATTACK, you fool.