Say Floyd beats Pacquiao.. does that erase the "ducking" issues

**Dynamite Kid** · 12-07-2008, 11:19 AM

Originally posted by iBox4Real

Say he beats Pac-Man... a guy that just raised the level of his game... imo higher than when Marg beat Cotto

would a win of that quality erase some of the "ducking" issues?

Not for me, cause he is still beating a smaller man fight Pacquiao and a real WW then i might consider laying of him.

**Welter_Skelter** · 12-07-2008, 11:20 AM

Originally posted by iBox4Real

Say he beats Pac-Man... a guy that just raised the level of his game... imo higher than when Marg beat Cotto

would a win of that quality erase some of the "ducking" issues?

It would mean he didn't duck PAC.. it wont change the past.. and He wouldn't win a Fight against PAC anyway

**kenso** · 12-07-2008, 11:21 AM

definitely, without a doubt.

they would need to fight at 140 or 135 though, not at welter.

**Fenom** · 12-07-2008, 11:21 AM

Originally posted by Welter_Skelter

It would mean he didn't duck PAC.. it wont change the past.. and He wouldn't win a Fight against PAC anyway

really? what makes u think that?

**Fenom** · 12-07-2008, 11:24 AM

Originally posted by kenso

definitely, without a doubt.

they would need to fight at 140 or 135 though, not at welter.

i guess its about Pac-Man now becoming the unavoided fighter in the game now.... who really would want to fight him other than for a nice payday

it might be too early to tell but i def see Pac-Man as becoming more and more unavoided.... the guys a threat in multiple weight classes!

**deevel79** · 12-07-2008, 11:27 AM

Even if Floyd comes back to take on Pacman, it still doesnt erase what he failed to do prior to his latest retirement.

Say Floyd beats Pacquiao.. does that erase the "ducking" issues