After-fight Etiquette (addition to NSB rules)

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • squealpiggy
    Stritctly UG's friend
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jan 2007
    • 28896
    • 2,028
    • 1,603
    • 66,600

    #1

    After-fight Etiquette (addition to NSB rules)

    Further to my award winning NSB rules thread, please see this list of etiquette associated with the aftermath of any big fight. The rules can be found here.

    After-fight Etiquette for Non Stop Boxing

    Immediately after the fight it is vitally important that as many people as possible start a topic with the result of the thread. Some people have missed it live and may want to wait until they have a chance to watch it, perhaps on the replay, before they hear the result. These people are IDIOTS and must be rescued from themselves. Remember in accordance with the rules if the winner is a fighter you like you MUST say that they "destroyed" their opponent. If on the other hand you despise the victor it is important to point out that the opponent was either cheated out of victory (ROBBERY OMFG!) or that there was some extenuating circumstances that preclude the victor from any credit (...was shot/...bad refereeing/...was too small/...looked bad).

    Following this if you are able to get online at all you must make a topic about how the victor is "ducking" someone else in the rankings, no matter how ludicrous a matchup it would be. For example a super featherweight who moves up to lightweight and wins will be "ducking" a junior middleweight, or a challenger who beats a champion to win the title will be "ducking" a guy who is ranked third even though generally if someone gives you the choice of fighting for the title or fighting a guy who is ranked below you without a title you would choose the title fight without a second thought.

    If the victor is already lining up his next fight then several things must happen:

    1. Their prospective opponent who has been talking about nothing else than the matchup with the victor "looks scared"
    2. The victor is ducking other guys who were never in the picture before
    3. People who dislike one of the fighters in this prospective matchup pick apart their record including every single poor performance in both their professional and amateur careers.

    Finally regardless of how bad a beatdown it is, regardless of how comprehensive a decision, regardless of how competitive it is, regardless of what is at stake, at least one person must claim that the loser "threw the fight".

    If you follow these simple rules then you will fit in well here.
  • squealpiggy
    Stritctly UG's friend
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jan 2007
    • 28896
    • 2,028
    • 1,603
    • 66,600

    #2
    If I called this thread "Oscar vs Pacman - my take" or "Who wins, Pacquiao vs Mayweather / Hatton / Williams / Klitschko" then it would be on its third page by now.

    Comment

    • SkillspayBills
      Garlic Butter Gang!
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Aug 2007
      • 29181
      • 2,155
      • 3,739
      • 61,188

      #3
      You forgot about the polls.
      ATG? poll
      Victor vs ? poll

      Comment

      • BattlingNelson
        Mod a Phukka
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Mar 2008
        • 29881
        • 3,255
        • 3,200
        • 286,536

        #4
        DLH was poisoned. He was completely grey already at the entrance. Arsenic does that to people.

        Somehow Margarito is involved.

        Comment

        • Derranged_
          Lomachicken skurred
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Sep 2004
          • 10193
          • 815
          • 2,233
          • 1,215

          #5
          Squeal Piggy, I would add this to the list:

          Pre, post, and during a big fight, create as many threads as you can, regardless if there are similar existing threads in NSB. That way you can be heard and feel important. And never restrict discussion about an ongoing fight to a 'round-by-round' thread. If you have an observation, create a thread!..

          Comment

          • Jim Jeffries
            rugged individualist
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Oct 2007
            • 20740
            • 1,376
            • 2,868
            • 54,838

            #6
            Originally posted by squealpiggy
            Further to my award winning NSB rules thread, please see this list of etiquette associated with the aftermath of any big fight. The rules can be found here.

            After-fight Etiquette for Non Stop Boxing

            Immediately after the fight it is vitally important that as many people as possible start a topic with the result of the thread. Some people have missed it live and may want to wait until they have a chance to watch it, perhaps on the replay, before they hear the result. These people are IDIOTS and must be rescued from themselves. Remember in accordance with the rules if the winner is a fighter you like you MUST say that they "destroyed" their opponent. If on the other hand you despise the victor it is important to point out that the opponent was either cheated out of victory (ROBBERY OMFG!) or that there was some extenuating circumstances that preclude the victor from any credit (...was shot/...bad refereeing/...was too small/...looked bad).

            Following this if you are able to get online at all you must make a topic about how the victor is "ducking" someone else in the rankings, no matter how ludicrous a matchup it would be. For example a super featherweight who moves up to lightweight and wins will be "ducking" a junior middleweight, or a challenger who beats a champion to win the title will be "ducking" a guy who is ranked third even though generally if someone gives you the choice of fighting for the title or fighting a guy who is ranked below you without a title you would choose the title fight without a second thought.

            If the victor is already lining up his next fight then several things must happen:

            1. Their prospective opponent who has been talking about nothing else than the matchup with the victor "looks scared"
            2. The victor is ducking other guys who were never in the picture before
            3. People who dislike one of the fighters in this prospective matchup pick apart their record including every single poor performance in both their professional and amateur careers.

            Finally regardless of how bad a beatdown it is, regardless of how comprehensive a decision, regardless of how competitive it is, regardless of what is at stake, at least one person must claim that the loser "threw the fight".

            If you follow these simple rules then you will fit in well here.
            Damn you and your correct grammar and spelling, logical and well thought out post/thread, and perfect assessment of the majority of posters on here. I have 3 brain cells left and they're running for their lives from this shot of Patron I just swallowed. So unless you agree with me that DLH is a bum and that Pac could beat Mayweather, Williams, Margarito and Cotto, on the same night, then piss off.

            Comment

            • squealpiggy
              Stritctly UG's friend
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jan 2007
              • 28896
              • 2,028
              • 1,603
              • 66,600

              #7
              Originally posted by Jim Jeffries
              Damn you and your correct grammar and spelling, logical and well thought out post/thread, and perfect assessment of the majority of posters on here. I have 3 brain cells left and they're running for their lives from this shot of Patron I just swallowed. So unless you agree with me that DLH is a bum and that Pac could beat Mayweather, Williams, Margarito and Cotto, on the same night, then piss off.
              Of course I agree! But someone should make a poll...

              Comment

              • Jim Jeffries
                rugged individualist
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Oct 2007
                • 20740
                • 1,376
                • 2,868
                • 54,838

                #8
                Originally posted by squealpiggy
                Of course I agree! But someone should make a poll...
                Sounds good. As long as the results of that poll of knowledgable and intelligent posters proves beyond a shadow of a doubt the outcome(s) in question.

                Comment

                • al caPWN
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Nov 2007
                  • 355
                  • 54
                  • 7
                  • 6,585

                  #9
                  There is no discussion in this forum. Only candidates for Team Tard.

                  There is no Dana. Only Zuul.

                  Comment

                  • squealpiggy
                    Stritctly UG's friend
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jan 2007
                    • 28896
                    • 2,028
                    • 1,603
                    • 66,600

                    #10
                    And I think this is pertinent.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP