Froch won but he's rubbish

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Marty Mcfly
    cool as a cucumber
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Apr 2008
    • 123
    • 19
    • 2
    • 6,208

    #41
    Froch is not "rubbish". He is exciting and wide open, but not rubbish. Some people are too quick to pick a fighter apart.

    Comment

    • hugh grant
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Apr 2006
      • 30540
      • 2,200
      • 925
      • 105,596

      #42
      I tip my hat off to froch tonight. But after this fight we have learned a lot about Froch. We learnt that Froch dont need to come out with so much of the if he hits people that they get knocked spark out kinda talk. Hes not as good as he wants people to think.
      But he beat an unbeaten fighter, so Froch is a tough boxer to expose. Pascal lost the zero on his resume, rather than Froch.

      Comment

      • MickyHatton
        PaThFiNdEr
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Nov 2005
        • 1611
        • 296
        • 462
        • 11,887

        #43
        Originally posted by Ryn0
        you asked a question to the people that had voiced opinions of him no? you asked whether they had followed his career and if they had seen him fight before tonight.

        I voiced and opinion therefore I am part of the group you were asking the question to....
        Actually I said 'I wonder', its a statement and I did not expect all in fact anyone to give me stats of which fights they had seen. As I was only wondering those that had seen him fight obviously did not come into that category, did they?

        The only question I asked you was regarding how you knew Kessler would 'most likely' stop him via a cut. That question still puzzles me?

        Comment

        • slicksouthpaw16
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jul 2007
          • 6374
          • 259
          • 501
          • 16,743

          #44
          People forget that the reason why Froch looked like he had bad defense was mainly because he was in with a very fast fighter and good boxer, and even then his face wasn't severely busted up. Its ok when you make mistakes but have the chin to make up for it, and his chin is rock solid because Pascal could truly punch. I give Froch a good shots at upsetting Kessler or Taylor on his best day.

          Comment

          • daggum
            All time great
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Feb 2008
            • 43731
            • 4,671
            • 3
            • 166,270

            #45
            Originally posted by slicksouthpaw16
            People forget that the reason why Froch looked like he had bad defense was mainly because he was in with a very fast fighter and good boxer, and even then his face wasn't severely busted up. Its ok when you make mistakes but have the chin to make up for it, and his chin is rock solid because Pascal could truly punch. I give Froch a good shots at upsetting Kessler or Taylor on his best day.
            he really can't though thats the thing. he's a very light puncher and he doesn't have many ko's and they all came on accumulation. he still made froch dazed and confused like matthew mcconaughey several times.

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP