Froch is not "rubbish". He is exciting and wide open, but not rubbish. Some people are too quick to pick a fighter apart.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Froch won but he's rubbish
Collapse
-
-
I tip my hat off to froch tonight. But after this fight we have learned a lot about Froch. We learnt that Froch dont need to come out with so much of the if he hits people that they get knocked spark out kinda talk. Hes not as good as he wants people to think.
But he beat an unbeaten fighter, so Froch is a tough boxer to expose. Pascal lost the zero on his resume, rather than Froch.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ryn0 View Postyou asked a question to the people that had voiced opinions of him no? you asked whether they had followed his career and if they had seen him fight before tonight.
I voiced and opinion therefore I am part of the group you were asking the question to....
The only question I asked you was regarding how you knew Kessler would 'most likely' stop him via a cut. That question still puzzles me?
Comment
-
People forget that the reason why Froch looked like he had bad defense was mainly because he was in with a very fast fighter and good boxer, and even then his face wasn't severely busted up. Its ok when you make mistakes but have the chin to make up for it, and his chin is rock solid because Pascal could truly punch. I give Froch a good shots at upsetting Kessler or Taylor on his best day.
Comment
-
Originally posted by slicksouthpaw16 View PostPeople forget that the reason why Froch looked like he had bad defense was mainly because he was in with a very fast fighter and good boxer, and even then his face wasn't severely busted up. Its ok when you make mistakes but have the chin to make up for it, and his chin is rock solid because Pascal could truly punch. I give Froch a good shots at upsetting Kessler or Taylor on his best day.
Comment
Comment