Froch-Taylor

[dstew]

Unfortunately, its one of those double standards yanks employ. Claiming Taylor should not fight Froch because he is a no-name etc, yet want Joe, for example, to fight a no name like Dawson who isn't **** over here.

Personally, Carl would kick **** outta Taylor, but would get his ass handed to him by Joe.

Did I say I thought Joe should fight Dawson or that Taylor should not fight Froch?

Since you asked though, I'd like to see both fights. But if either Joe or Jermain can find more lucrative deals out there that are equally or more challenging, then more power to them.

And LMAO at Froch handing Taylor's ass to him. Because he has now beaten the almighty Jean Pascal, and everything. You comparing Froch's situation to Dawson is pretty funny now that I think about it, considering Dawson has wins over Tarver and Glen Johnson... but Froch's win over Pascal, now that is HUGE!

[medium-deek]

You comparing Froch's situation to Dawson is pretty funny now that I think about it, considering Dawson has wins over Tarver and Glen Johnson... but Froch's win over Pascal, now that is HUGE!

Oh come on. Wins over a 40 year old "legend killer" doesn't mean anything. And we all know Glenn was robbed.

OK, if or how Froch beats Taylor is not important. What is important is Taylor avoiding Froch and chasing the IBF champ, who we all know (lets be honest, you know this is true) is an easier opponant.