Is JMM the most popular fighter on boxingscene

[Bonsi]

isn't he the gay guy?

ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!

[Sonic Flood]

Nope.. No one talks about him here. In fact his last PPV was 10k PPV..

He's just another fighter no one pays to watch.

[loui_ludwig]

Most Of The Media Said Jmm Won The Fight.

True but like i posted before, the media(like the Ring mag) said that even though they had it for JMM, the fight wasn't a robbery, it was a closed fight that could have gone either way(it went Pac's way), the judges saw something on the fight that they made it scored it that way, and the judges decision must stand and respected.

I don't remember the name anymore, its either World Boxing or KO Boxing mag(under the Ring mag), when they had an article on Pac fighting the jr. lightweight and lightweight fighters and who they think will win. They had Guzman, Barrera, JMM, Diaz, and Casamayor. On their prediction on the Pac-JMM rematch, they have Pac winning by a close decision and might even be controversial. Well, it did happen that way. This article was in 2006, 2 years before the rematch.

JMM wasn't robbed of a win. The Ring mag writes small article on robberies of a fight if there is one. They call it "magoo". Example is the Casamayor-Santa Cruz fight. They believed(including other medias and fans) have Santa winning but it went to Casa. On the next 2 issues of Ring mag, there were no "magoo" on the JMM-Pac fight.

There were topics(including other forums) that Pac did not clearly beat JMM. Well, it can be say the same thing with JMM. He didn't clearly beat Pac. Why? Well, just look at the judges scorecards. And medias even said it was a closed fight that could have gone either way(repeating myself again, sorry). If JMM really wants to beat Pac, then he needs to clearly beat him. Just like how Erik Morales did it to Pac.

Morales-Pac 1, closed fight with a clear winner.
Pac-JMM 2, closed fight that could have gone either way.

[loui_ludwig]

ha ha ha....my mom is 67.

Your moms a Gilf.

[egreezy]

Not too many threads on him, #1p4p in my opinion beat pacman twice if you ask me. I really wanna see him fight Juan Diaz and Nate Campbell in 2009. I'm worried his age is catching up with him even though he knocked out Casamayor I thought he would have looked better in earlier rounds, maybe its a styles thing.

[PapaMo]

Japanese people loves JMM too!

[Chups]

Japanese people loves JMM too!

It's the other way around.

[PapaMo]

It's the other way around.

Oops! my bad.

[Me La Pelan]

True but like i posted before, the media(like the Ring mag) said that even though they had it for JMM, the fight wasn't a robbery, it was a closed fight that could have gone either way(it went Pac's way), the judges saw something on the fight that they made it scored it that way, and the judges decision must stand and respected.

I don't remember the name anymore, its either World Boxing or KO Boxing mag(under the Ring mag), when they had an article on Pac fighting the jr. lightweight and lightweight fighters and who they think will win. They had Guzman, Barrera, JMM, Diaz, and Casamayor. On their prediction on the Pac-JMM rematch, they have Pac winning by a close decision and might even be controversial. Well, it did happen that way. This article was in 2006, 2 years before the rematch.

JMM wasn't robbed of a win. The Ring mag writes small article on robberies of a fight if there is one. They call it "magoo". Example is the Casamayor-Santa Cruz fight. They believed(including other medias and fans) have Santa winning but it went to Casa. On the next 2 issues of Ring mag, there were no "magoo" on the JMM-Pac fight.

There were topics(including other forums) that Pac did not clearly beat JMM. Well, it can be say the same thing with JMM. He didn't clearly beat Pac. Why? Well, just look at the judges scorecards. And medias even said it was a closed fight that could have gone either way(repeating myself again, sorry). If JMM really wants to beat Pac, then he needs to clearly beat him. Just like how Erik Morales did it to Pac.

Morales-Pac 1, closed fight with a clear winner.
Pac-JMM 2, closed fight that could have gone either way.

I know what you mean, but last time I checked you HAD to beat the CHAMP to get his Title. Manny didn't beat him.
Ring mag wouldn't do all that, especially since it had JMM winning then HAVING TO GIVE the ring mag belt to Manny. How would it look if they started talking about how they accept the wrong decision.

[2501]

of course leave it to the pinoys to come in and basicly validate the purpose of the thread.