Who is the better overall boxer?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ACHlLLES
    watch ur mouth
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Aug 2008
    • 8398
    • 236
    • 359
    • 15,211

    #1

    Who is the better overall boxer?

    Hopkins or Glen Johnson? Now, don't look at glen johnson's losses because he got robbed in alot of his losses.

    Only people who believe Chad Dawson beat Glen Johnson are Chad Dawson fans. 80 percent of the boxing world believes Glen Johnson beat Chad Dawson. Only 20 percent of the nutt hugging Dawson fans believe he beat Glen Johnson. That is what the showtime poll shows.

    As Glen Johnson has already said, 80 percent of the boxing population believes I won that fight.
    8
    Hopkins
    87.50%
    7
    Johnson
    0.00%
    0
    Undecided
    12.50%
    1
    Last edited by ACHlLLES; 11-26-2008, 11:29 PM.
  • slicksouthpaw16
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jul 2007
    • 6374
    • 259
    • 501
    • 16,743

    #2
    Obviously Hopkins. He didn't fight the kind of opposition that Johnson fought though. Glen would fight anyone.

    Comment

    • warp1432
      the mailman
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jul 2007
      • 14406
      • 478
      • 347
      • 24,060

      #3
      Well considering that Hopkins battered Johnson and beat Tarver, who Johnson barely beat the first fight and lost to the rematch too, obviously Hopkins.

      You coud say that "Johnson wasn't in his prime and got better with age", he had 32 fights and was undefeated. That and no footage of Johnson pre Hopkins really exists so it's hard to say. That and he went through a rough patch where he became the road warrior. He was always pretty good.

      Comment

      Working...
      TOP