Paul Williams: "Margarito Used To Be The Most Feared"
Collapse
-
Are you on crack?? How doesn't it matter??? Way to ignore my question. I thought you were an intelligent PW nuthugger??cmon man....none of that **** matters.....
bernard hopkins had 20 defenses, and over 10 years of being undefeated at MW..... he lost to JT twice, but since he had more defenses than JT hopkins was still #1 at MW? gtfoh man!!!!
surely you understand the quite simple logical argument that many people make that says "when you've beaten the man, you become the man....."
margarito HAD 9 defenses, then he fought PW.....but somehow those 9 previous defenses, dismisses that?
you're right, i'm wrong. i have no business arguing w/ margarito fans....they're too smart.
sorry dogg, for trying to reason.Leave a comment:
-
say the ***en dumbest paul will nuthugger on this site.
you should post under your flawless account your much funnerLeave a comment:
-
It looks like Chicano79US is the boyfriend of Margarito.. Until the Mosley, Ducking Williams thread.. This idiot can't live without Margarita..
How many times did you suck Margarito's *****?Leave a comment:
-
cmon man....none of that **** matters.....
bernard hopkins had 20 defenses, and over 10 years of being undefeated at MW..... he lost to JT twice, but since he had more defenses than JT hopkins was still #1 at MW? gtfoh man!!!!
surely you understand the quite simple logical argument that many people make that says "when you've beaten the man, you become the man....."
margarito HAD 9 defenses, then he fought PW.....but somehow those 9 previous defenses, dismisses that?
you're right, i'm wrong. i have no business arguing w/ margarito fans....they're too smart.
sorry dogg, for trying to reason.Leave a comment:
-
answer that question for me...but i got another one for you too...
how many of the top WW has shane mosley beat in the last couple years? but that didn't stop margarito from fighting him, did it?
this is the **** that irks me.....i don't mind arguing w/ margarito fans, but its this kinda side talk, that makes it impossible to.......
none of you can give me a valid reason why margarito should not be fighting him....
Shane Mosley is still a top 5 Welterweight. He's not the Andy Kolle of the Division.Leave a comment:
-
you're doing the same thing w/ margarito!!!! you're putting him on top b/c he beat cotto! surely, beating kermit cintron isn't a valid reason to be "on top."
bottom line is, cotto was at the top, margarito beat him, so now many view margarito as being on top.....
my question is plain and simple....the fact that margarito is the top gun, and PW beat him, means nothing as far as PW being able to call himself the man?
How am I doing it with Margarito??? ANSWER THIS QUESTION......WHO Else in the WW division has fought more Top Welterweights than Margarito?????? WHO??? Margarito has 9 Defenses!!! Yes 9 more than PWs.
Has PW beaten Clottey?? Cintron??? Cotto???
OOOO he beat Quintana, the same one who beat him earlier.Last edited by Mr. Fantastic; 11-26-2008, 07:27 PM.Leave a comment:
-
you're doing the same thing w/ margarito!!!! you're putting him on top b/c he beat cotto! surely, beating kermit cintron isn't a valid reason to be "on top."
bottom line is, cotto was at the top, margarito beat him, so now many view margarito as being on top.....
my question is plain and simple....the fact that margarito is the top gun, and PW beat him, means nothing as far as PW being able to call himself the man?Leave a comment:
-
answer that question for me...but i got another one for you too...
how many of the top WW has shane mosley beat in the last couple years? but that didn't stop margarito from fighting him, did it?
this is the **** that irks me.....i don't mind arguing w/ margarito fans, but its this kinda side talk, that makes it impossible to.......
none of you can give me a valid reason why margarito should not be fighting him....Leave a comment:
-
Don't you know how to read?? I've already said plenty of times he beat Margarito. You're putting him at the top for just one win lol.Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: