McGirt threw in the towel because he had money on the fight.

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • salsaking
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Nov 2007
    • 360
    • 5
    • 0
    • 6,496

    #1

    McGirt threw in the towel because he had money on the fight.

    I have a feeling the towel was thrown at the moment it was because McGirt or his people had some serious money riding on the under in the fight. I was closely following the live betting odds online and as it got closer to the line (11 1/2 rds) the betting lines were skyrocketting in favor of the over since it seemed like Paulie would go the distance. Right at the beginning of round 11 the odds were something like +2500 for the under since all Paulie had to do was survive 1/2 around. Is it a coincidence the fight was stopped 30 seconds before it would've gone into the "over"? I think there's some serious BS going on here..... Any thoughts?
  • deevel79
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Dec 2005
    • 6831
    • 213
    • 27
    • 13,404

    #2
    Although i dont agree with the stoppage, if Paulie had actually done something besides throw one jab at a time and hold, all the while eating leather from Ricky, Buddy would've had no reason to do what he did. Buddy didnt throw this fight. Paulie did.

    Comment

    • Grand Champ
      Banned
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jul 2007
      • 12782
      • 968
      • 1,313
      • 23,079

      #3
      IMO he threw the towel way too soon, but I don't think it's because the man had money on his fighters opponent :P Could be funny if he had a bet on Hatton though.

      Comment

      • rizkybizness
        enjoy the silence
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jul 2007
        • 26337
        • 672
        • 356
        • 36,512

        #4
        and JFK wasn't assasinated by Lee Harvey Oswald, there was a second gunman firing his rifle out of an invisible blimp.

        Comment

        • salsaking
          Contender
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Nov 2007
          • 360
          • 5
          • 0
          • 6,496

          #5
          I dont know man, think about it..... someone with inside info from McGirt decides to put in $100 on the under right at the start of the 11th round..... the payoff on that is $2,500..... if they put $1000 the payoff is $25,000......

          Comment

          • Pullcounter
            no guts no glory
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jan 2004
            • 42582
            • 549
            • 191
            • 49,739

            #6
            Originally posted by salsaking
            I have a feeling the towel was thrown at the moment it was because McGirt or his people had some serious money riding on the under in the fight. I was closely following the live betting odds online and as it got closer to the line (11 1/2 rds) the betting lines were skyrocketting in favor of the over since it seemed like Paulie would go the distance. Right at the beginning of round 11 the odds were something like +2500 for the under since all Paulie had to do was survive 1/2 around. Is it a coincidence the fight was stopped 30 seconds before it would've gone into the "over"? I think there's some serious BS going on here..... Any thoughts?
            nah i doubt he had money on the fight

            Comment

            • xzworks
              Randy Suico Fan
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Sep 2005
              • 1847
              • 260
              • 333
              • 12,107

              #7
              dont agree, but mcgirt should finish the fight..paulie survives cotto..i think he stop the fight coz paulie makes hatton bad..he can't KO paulie in 140...

              Comment

              • mrpain81
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Jun 2007
                • 12112
                • 986
                • 870
                • 35,268

                #8
                McGirt has a history of stopping fights, he doesn't like to see his fighters take beatings.

                Gatti vs Mayweather

                Brewster vs Wlad

                Paulie vs Hatton

                Comment

                • Barndog
                  Banned
                  • Aug 2008
                  • 0
                  • 42
                  • 36
                  • 816

                  #9
                  Originally posted by mrpain81
                  McGirt has a history of stopping fights, he doesn't like to see his fighters take beatings.

                  Gatti vs Mayweather

                  Brewster vs Wlad

                  Paulie vs Hatton
                  A responsible attitude to take.

                  It's not as if Paulie was protecting a precious perfect record.

                  Comment

                  • Dan...
                    Fredette About It
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Jun 2008
                    • 7675
                    • 454
                    • 951
                    • 19,200

                    #10
                    I disagree. He simply recognised that Paulie was way behind on the cards and had no chance of stopping Hatton so he called it. I still don't agree with the stoppage though. Paulie is a tough kid and he deserved to finish the fight on his own terms. The beating he was taking wasn't dangerous.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP