Hatton vs. Cotto @ 140

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ch@mpBox@PR
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Feb 2008
    • 21432
    • 432
    • 279
    • 22,261

    #51
    Originally posted by HTownTexan
    So I thought Gomez would box a better tahn he did and that Cotto would have under trained and under estimated him. Cotto didnt, and what?

    When did I say I hate PR's?? I said I didnt like their fighters because Tito was a dirty fighter, and Cotto was a dirty fighter. Whats the big ****in deal? **** You. Always act like a hard ass on your cpu, which means in real life, you're a *****.
    Why you say PR fighters are dirty?Tito was not a dirty fighter nor Cotto. because you saying that, means that you think also that, JC Chavez was dirty and Erick Morales was dirty ect ect.they are just agreesive fighters that hit a lot to the body. bernar Hpkins was a dirty fighter, ricardo Mayor is a dirty figher, ect,ect. Come on now!!!!!!!

    Comment

    • BMWM3P
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Apr 2008
      • 5402
      • 245
      • 345
      • 12,386

      #52
      Originally posted by HTownTexan
      Naw, I'm cool. It's known I dont like Cotto as a fighter..Cool. But I cant say **** about him, even when I back it up with facts, and dont come like Viva Mexico, or Xcaret....

      But people just talk ****, and TRY to get personal...Pulling pictures from ******* from when me and my girl were 17, and I am about to be 25 now?? That is some hoe ass ****..

      That is childish.
      Facts, all you have shown is that you're biased against Cotto. You have zero objectivity when it comes to Cotto maybe if you showed some people would take you more seriously.

      Comment

      • Ch@mpBox@PR
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Feb 2008
        • 21432
        • 432
        • 279
        • 22,261

        #53
        Originally posted by HTownTexan
        Thats the same Tszyu that just about a year earlier KTFO of Zab.. NASTY..

        Ricky was and is a good fighter... He didnt just get to where he is and was by being a Chop Chop kind of fighter. He put in work and did his thing..

        All i am saying is Cotto at 140 was beatable.

        At 147 he is an elite, in the big 3.

        At 140, with his weight issues, and his chin being suspect at that weight Hatton would have won.
        Now you see? thats a great post and a unbiased one. Now your making sense

        Comment

        • My Name Is...
          Banned
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Feb 2008
          • 8132
          • 444
          • 82
          • 15,924

          #54
          Originally posted by Ch@mpBox@PR
          Why you say PR fighters are dirty?Tito was not a dirty fighter nor Cotto. because you saying that, means that you think also that, JC Chavez was dirty and Erick Morales was dirty ect ect.they are just agreesive fighters that hit a lot to the body. bernar Hpkins was a dirty fighter, ricardo Mayor is a dirty figher, ect,ect. Come on now!!!!!!!
          There is dirty then there is Tito dirty. Tito took it to another level.


          Whenever he was hurt.. you already know, here comes a low blow. he did it to David Reid and to Vargas.

          He hit Roy jones with 81 lowblows. I promise i counted them (I was bored).

          Same thing with Cotto. When he got hurt against Torres, here came the low blows. Same thing with Zab.

          I know Mayo is dirty, i dont like him for his fighting style, I like him because he is entertaining. Bernard, I know he is dirty, but I like im becaue he beat Tito, after Tito did in my favorite fight David Reid. I dont like dirty fighters as a whole.

          Comment

          • AntonTheMeh
            STOP CRYIN
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Sep 2007
            • 21222
            • 700
            • 709
            • 31,623

            #55
            Originally posted by Ch@mpBox@PR
            Why you say PR fighters are dirty?Tito was not a dirty fighter nor Cotto. because you saying that, means that you think also that, JC Chavez was dirty and Erick Morales was dirty ect ect.they are just agreesive fighters that hit a lot to the body. bernar Hpkins was a dirty fighter, ricardo Mayor is a dirty figher, ect,ect. Come on now!!!!!!!
            usually when there are double standards, they're are underlining reasons.everybody gets a pass but pr fighters
            and i take **** seriously
            Last edited by AntonTheMeh; 11-22-2008, 04:30 PM.

            Comment

            • hammerhiem
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • May 2008
              • 4877
              • 129
              • 102
              • 11,163

              #56
              kostya was washed up.everybody knows it
              yeah right, he was no1 at 140 coming of a awesome preformance against a top 5 rated Mitchell.

              he wasn't washed up, past prime certainly but there was maybe 1% of people gave Hatton a chance before that fight.

              Comment

              • My Name Is...
                Banned
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Feb 2008
                • 8132
                • 444
                • 82
                • 15,924

                #57
                Originally posted by BMWM3P
                Facts, all you have shown is that you're biased against Cotto. You have zero objectivity when it comes to Cotto maybe if you showed some people would take you more seriously.
                Now the boy in your Sig, Thats a PR fighter i can roll with..

                That boy is the truth. I just hope he doesnt fight Vasquez, because one of my favorite fighters of now would be losing.

                Comment

                • AntonTheMeh
                  STOP CRYIN
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Sep 2007
                  • 21222
                  • 700
                  • 709
                  • 31,623

                  #58
                  Originally posted by hammerhiem
                  yeah right, he was no1 at 140 coming of a awesome preformance against a top 5 rated Mitchell.

                  he wasn't washed up, past prime certainly but there was maybe 1% of people gave Hatton a chance before that fight.
                  oh ****, now I'm inventing ****.
                  plenty of people have said it.

                  Comment

                  • Dirk Diggler UK
                    Deleted
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jun 2008
                    • 48836
                    • 1,312
                    • 693
                    • 58,902

                    #59
                    Hatton wins at 140

                    Cotto wins at 147

                    Comment

                    • The Surgeon
                      Days Of Glory
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Oct 2006
                      • 15385
                      • 712
                      • 1,578
                      • 24,784

                      #60
                      Cotto beats Hatton at 147 and and 140 right up untill the end of his career at the weight when his struggle with the scales was effecting him like it did against Paullie. He wins because he's the better fighter in all areas

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP