Is it safe to say Benard Hopkins ruins fighters?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ELPacman
    LEGENDARY
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Apr 2004
    • 10826
    • 1,970
    • 151
    • 34,372

    #1

    Is it safe to say Benard Hopkins ruins fighters?

    Every big named fighter it seems that Hopkins has faced and beat or even lost to(Taylor), are never the same afterwards or they just disappear completely(Winky). How many fighters out there were so good at beating their opponent that they are mentally damaged after the fight even if they weren't KOed, just being so thoroughly outboxed or schooled? I used to hate Benard back in the day for his boring style, but now I respect him more, especially since he took so many more chances against Pavlik. It's like, he understands his role in boxing and has adapted to his name the executioner in truth. He'll be missed when he retires.
    42
    Yes
    54.76%
    23
    No
    45.24%
    19
  • warp1432
    the mailman
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jul 2007
    • 14406
    • 478
    • 347
    • 24,060

    #2
    Well yes and no. I'll say yes because I'm a huge Hopkins fan

    Comment

    • Naps
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Sep 2007
      • 5660
      • 339
      • 415
      • 15,109

      #3
      Yeah, he ruined Calzaghe. Look at that performance against RJJ, awful

      RJJ and Hopkins BUMS!!

      Comment

      • The Gully Gad
        Jeffery Hype
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jul 2008
        • 42711
        • 2,053
        • 2,263
        • 54,550

        #4
        He ruins them at the time yeh...

        Comment

        • Grand Champ
          Banned
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Jul 2007
          • 12782
          • 968
          • 1,313
          • 23,079

          #5
          Hopkins make fighters insecure in the ring. He breaks down their rhytm and timing completely and only does only enough to win the rounds, which completely frustrate his opponents. If you're a young champion and you're forced to fight a 43 year old veterans fight, yeah I guess that does something to some fighters IMHO.

          Comment

          • TonyJ
            Interim Champion
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Sep 2006
            • 503
            • 16
            • 0
            • 7,973

            #6
            From round 3-12 in the Calzaghe fight Hopkins himslef looked insecure.
            Bernard is a very smart fighter. I wouldn't say he ruins fighters. But he exposes their weaknesses like nobody else. If you have a weak point, I am sure Hopkins will find it.
            Last edited by TonyJ; 11-20-2008, 09:07 PM.

            Comment

            • Mr. Fantastic
              Banned
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • May 2008
              • 19036
              • 527
              • 1,328
              • 20,027

              #7
              I still see DLH making TONS of $$$$$ in fights.

              I saw Calzaghe put a beatdown on Roy Jones.

              I would say no.

              Comment

              • Grand Champ
                Banned
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Jul 2007
                • 12782
                • 968
                • 1,313
                • 23,079

                #8
                Yeah, thats because no1 IMO adapt as quick as Calzaghe + he's relentless. he never stops, never quits and keeps trying, pushes forward and punches every second of every round. He's like no boxer i've ever seen. He himself ****'s up the other fighters rhytm by his own relentless rhytm
                Last edited by Grand Champ; 11-20-2008, 09:11 PM.

                Comment

                • Breakbeat
                  Banned
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Aug 2005
                  • 7018
                  • 233
                  • 237
                  • 8,994

                  #9
                  Originally posted by ELPacman
                  Every big named fighter it seems that Hopkins has faced and beat or even lost to(Taylor), are never the same afterwards or they just disappear completely(Winky). How many fighters out there were so good at beating their opponent that they are mentally damaged after the fight even if they weren't KOed, just being so thoroughly outboxed or schooled? I used to hate Benard back in the day for his boring style, but now I respect him more, especially since he took so many more chances against Pavlik. It's like, he understands his role in boxing and has adapted to his name the executioner in truth. He'll be missed when he retires.
                  For all those people who find it more convenient to bother you with their question rather than to Google it for themselves.

                  Comment

                  • Bhopreign
                    Banned
                    • Jun 2006
                    • 11273
                    • 419
                    • 100
                    • 12,036

                    #10
                    Talk about anything boxing related here. Where the boxing discussion is always Non Stop!

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP