November 22, 1986: Mike Tyson vs. Berbick...Youngest HW Champion
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
I've read quotes from Lewis where he basically says that it was a no-win so why not make it for most-money. It was smart business all the way. If they stay in the tourney, they get peanuts on HBO. Instead they get quadruple on PPV. It wasn't backed into a corner...it was picking when to come out of it.Comment
-
= we are scared of Tyson and will keep waiting until we have to fight him. The positive to all of this would be there would be more Money.I've read quotes from Lewis where he basically says that it was a no-win so why not make it for most-money. It was smart business all the way. If they stay in the tourney, they get peanuts on HBO. Instead they get quadruple on PPV. It wasn't backed into a corner...it was picking when to come out of it.
Not wanting to fight until you have no choice is still avoiding.
I've always thought the "CHAMP" is supposed to want to fight the best...but I guess the Champ/King waits until his country is invaded by the Tyson army, who surrounds the Spinks castle giving the King no choice but to come out.
Spinks lost the belts by vacating them; he was no longer Champion on the terms of being a *****.
There is no such thing as an imaginary title.
Spinks abdicated the throne.Comment
-
But he didn't vacate for Tyson...he vacated because he had a mando with Tucker and Lewis didn't want to lose Tyson (and wanted the Cooney money). Difference. And F sanctioning bodies anyways.= we are scared of Tyson and will keep waiting until we have to fight him. The positive to all of this would be there would be more Money.
Not wanting to fight until you have no choice is still avoiding.
I've always thought the "CHAMP" is supposed to want to fight the best...but I guess the Champ/King waits until his country is invaded by the Tyson army, who surrounds the Spinks castle giving the King no choice but to come out.
Spinks lost the belts by vacating them; he was no longer Champion on the terms of being a *****.
There is no such thing as an imaginary title.
Spinks abdicated the throne.
Like I said, Tyson was either THE champ after Spinks OR Tucker...neither making him youngest.
Comment
-
So you are going by when Spinks vacated the title?But he didn't vacate for Tyson...he vacated because he had a mando with Tucker and Lewis didn't want to lose Tyson (and wanted the Cooney money). Difference. And F sanctioning bodies anyways.
Like I said, Tyson was either THE champ after Spinks OR Tucker...neither making him youngest.
If sanctioning bodies mean nothing their titles mean nothing and so does a Magazine title.
So then we have to ask: Who was the Champion; who was the best?Last edited by Benny Leonard; 11-22-2008, 07:03 PM.Comment
-
No, IF you use Tucker you go by the night of Tyson-Tucker in 87. I go by Tyson-Spinks. I don't buy that vacating/being stripped by the BF vacated the lineal title. I'm a beat the man to be him purist where applicable.
Comment
Comment