Say it ain't so Roy....Roy and Joe are considering a rematch
Collapse
-
Calzaghe would go down a long way in my estimation if he takes this fight. It was so one-sided that a rematch shouldn't even be discussed.
If, as Calzaghe says, he's not interested in the money there is no reason to take the fight unless Roy has a cast iron legal rematch clause in the original contract that he intends to pursue.
I don't think there is a fight out there for Joe but if he insists on another it can only be Dawson or Bhop again.Comment
-
I have a feeling Joe picks #2. Why because Taylor is the biggest threat to his resume. He has matched his wins over Hopkins and Lacy. If he goes on to beat Kessler later everything Calzaghe has done will seem minimized. And he probally wants a win over Taylor which is something Hopkins does not have.Comment
-
roy doesnt deserve a rematch straight up...
win another 2 fights... and try again MAYBE...
jermaine would be a great fight for me personally... jermain isnt as active, doesn tthrow a lot of punches... has stamina problems himself... doesnt have the greatest defense, leaves his left hang down real low... and isnt a polished boxer... i think thats very winnable for roy
if u watch that joe fight a few times, roy didnt look as bad as it appeared, that cut made it look terrible...Comment
-
Heres what I want...
I want a rematch with Calzaghe...but the judges are as follows....Me, Robjr, Wess and the referee is Ree****yaluss. This way everything is fair.
Also Calzaghe must only train for 2 weeks. Roy gets 8 weeks to prepare.
That to me would be fair.
Comment
-
Roy vs Taylor is very winnable for Roy indeed. Taylor should be easy to figure out even for this version of Roy, plus he doesnt punch too hard. It could go quite similar to Roy vs Tito, even if less onesided maybe. Very risky fight to take for Jermaine, if he loses to a 40y old Roy who just lost to Calzaghe, his credit could go well downComment
Comment