most of the old fighters are overhyped
Collapse
-
-
But no one would ever argue that he's an all time great or better than Scottie Pippen or someone else that was healthy, he may have been more skilled and yes in the right conditions may have been a better player for a time, but we're talking historically. Bill Walton is remembered more for his college career, that's apples and oranges.Comment
-
Yeah, but it is kind of unfair to compare only their eras as well: Marciano was "lucky "to go up against the likes of a shot Joe Louis, past prime Charles, Walcott and Moore.Lets face it Vitali has a 9 inch height, 65 lb weight advantage over Rocky.
Marciano wouldn't win but in his era he did greater than Vitali did in his. You don't rank fighters based on how they would do in imaginary match-up's. You rank them based on what they actually did.
5-10 lbs less and Marciano would've been a light heavyweight.
Just look at how many fights they had; how long they had been fighting; how many times they were knocked down, knocked out, in tough battles, etc. That's Mental and Physical wear and tear.
Plus, the names I mentioned above, all under 200 pounds. Moore and Charles were known as light-heavyweights who started below that. Walcott; a journeyman.
And it's not like Marciano knocked them out in 1.Comment
-
Yeah, I know, but damn, remember Grant Hill when he was healthy...miss him; all class.But no one would ever argue that he's an all time great or better than Scottie Pippen or someone else that was healthy, he may have been more skilled and yes in the right conditions may have been a better player for a time, but we're talking historically. Bill Walton is remembered more for his college career, that's apples and oranges.Comment
-
They would probably be alot more technical and skilled in the ring, yes. but that doesn't make Marciano hyped at all. He still beat the best of his era just like Lewis and Holyfield did/almost did. weather or not Marciano would win or lose a fight with a modern fight is subjective and something that can only be played out in our fantasy. What we CAN look at is how well did manage to perform during their era, and the old ATG performed as well as life allowed'em to do, beating the best of their time. If you think that's a hyped fighter then we don't see eye to eyeComment
-
They would probably be alot more technical and skilled in the ring, yes. but that doesn't make Marciano hyped at all. He still beat the best of his era just like Lewis and Holyfield did/almost did. weather or not Marciano would win or lose a fight with a modern fight is subjective and something that can only be played out in our fantasy. What we CAN look at is how well did manage to perform during their era, and the old ATG performed as well as life allowed'em to do, beating the best of their time. If you think that's a hyped fighter then we don't see eye to eye
as far as im concerned Holy,Lewis resume stands upto Marciano's and they were better fighters period because they both would of beaten him
that is how i see it anywayComment
-
Marciano was rough and rugged and could knock you down, he'd defintly be a contender this era and the one before... His record is a testiment to that, while his body of work or fights or style may not be.. He wouldnt just get KOd by Lewis or for that matter Dominate Holyfield... Who the **** knows how those fights would turn out.. With that said its ok to speculate but to announce is rude and inaccurate! Marciano is a ATG Lewis top 50 Holyfield top 30!Comment
-
Comment