most of the old fighters are overhyped

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dynamite Kid
    Slicker than your average
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Feb 2007
    • 20701
    • 627
    • 209
    • 38,291

    #21
    Originally posted by TheManchine
    Many actually rank Lewis over Marciano.

    The reason you don't see Vitali on any lists is because he achieved nothing compared to the heavyweight greats. His greatest win was his loss to Lennox Lewis, other than that he beat mediocre opposition (Peter, Sanders, Hide, K. Johnson).
    VK he has not achieved as much NO but he gives Marciano a beating and he gives most of those great HW a helluva fight and he beats his fair share imo

    a guy as big a durable as VK would give anybody trouble

    Comment

    • dans
      Journeyman
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jun 2006
      • 6835
      • 212
      • 134
      • 13,712

      #22
      Originally posted by Benny Leonard
      Actually, Grant Hill was a great player. Bill Walton is considered great and how often did he play in the NBA?
      But no one would ever argue that he's an all time great or better than Scottie Pippen or someone else that was healthy, he may have been more skilled and yes in the right conditions may have been a better player for a time, but we're talking historically. Bill Walton is remembered more for his college career, that's apples and oranges.

      Comment

      • Benny Leonard
        Liberty
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Feb 2007
        • 7436
        • 303
        • 38
        • 14,471

        #23
        Originally posted by TheManchine
        Lets face it Vitali has a 9 inch height, 65 lb weight advantage over Rocky.

        Marciano wouldn't win but in his era he did greater than Vitali did in his. You don't rank fighters based on how they would do in imaginary match-up's. You rank them based on what they actually did.

        5-10 lbs less and Marciano would've been a light heavyweight.
        Yeah, but it is kind of unfair to compare only their eras as well: Marciano was "lucky "to go up against the likes of a shot Joe Louis, past prime Charles, Walcott and Moore.

        Just look at how many fights they had; how long they had been fighting; how many times they were knocked down, knocked out, in tough battles, etc. That's Mental and Physical wear and tear.


        Plus, the names I mentioned above, all under 200 pounds. Moore and Charles were known as light-heavyweights who started below that. Walcott; a journeyman.

        And it's not like Marciano knocked them out in 1.

        Comment

        • Benny Leonard
          Liberty
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Feb 2007
          • 7436
          • 303
          • 38
          • 14,471

          #24
          Originally posted by dans01234
          But no one would ever argue that he's an all time great or better than Scottie Pippen or someone else that was healthy, he may have been more skilled and yes in the right conditions may have been a better player for a time, but we're talking historically. Bill Walton is remembered more for his college career, that's apples and oranges.
          Yeah, I know, but damn, remember Grant Hill when he was healthy...miss him; all class.

          Comment

          • Grand Champ
            Banned
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jul 2007
            • 12782
            • 968
            • 1,313
            • 23,079

            #25
            Originally posted by Terrible...
            you also got remember what modern day fighters like Holyfield and Lewis have achieved they would not have a good shot at beating the likes of Marciano they would beat him as fas as im concerned
            They would probably be alot more technical and skilled in the ring, yes. but that doesn't make Marciano hyped at all. He still beat the best of his era just like Lewis and Holyfield did/almost did. weather or not Marciano would win or lose a fight with a modern fight is subjective and something that can only be played out in our fantasy. What we CAN look at is how well did manage to perform during their era, and the old ATG performed as well as life allowed'em to do, beating the best of their time. If you think that's a hyped fighter then we don't see eye to eye

            Comment

            • dans
              Journeyman
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jun 2006
              • 6835
              • 212
              • 134
              • 13,712

              #26
              Originally posted by Benny Leonard
              Yeah, I know, but damn, remember Grant Hill when he was healthy...miss him; all class.
              True. What a shame.

              Comment

              • Dynamite Kid
                Slicker than your average
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2007
                • 20701
                • 627
                • 209
                • 38,291

                #27
                Originally posted by Grand Champ
                They would probably be alot more technical and skilled in the ring, yes. but that doesn't make Marciano hyped at all. He still beat the best of his era just like Lewis and Holyfield did/almost did. weather or not Marciano would win or lose a fight with a modern fight is subjective and something that can only be played out in our fantasy. What we CAN look at is how well did manage to perform during their era, and the old ATG performed as well as life allowed'em to do, beating the best of their time. If you think that's a hyped fighter then we don't see eye to eye

                as far as im concerned Holy,Lewis resume stands upto Marciano's and they were better fighters period because they both would of beaten him

                that is how i see it anyway

                Comment

                • GreatestIam
                  GreatestIam
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Apr 2006
                  • 3392
                  • 215
                  • 53
                  • 11,504

                  #28
                  Marciano was rough and rugged and could knock you down, he'd defintly be a contender this era and the one before... His record is a testiment to that, while his body of work or fights or style may not be.. He wouldnt just get KOd by Lewis or for that matter Dominate Holyfield... Who the **** knows how those fights would turn out.. With that said its ok to speculate but to announce is rude and inaccurate! Marciano is a ATG Lewis top 50 Holyfield top 30!

                  Comment

                  • sitai
                    Contender
                    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                    • Jul 2007
                    • 303
                    • 7
                    • 0
                    • 6,380

                    #29
                    yeah but you really can't compare era's... it's unfair

                    in most of the sports that i watch the athletes of today are far superior to those of the past...
                    bigger, stronger, fitter and technically better.

                    there's obviously a reason for that
                    Last edited by sitai; 11-17-2008, 10:11 AM.

                    Comment

                    • larryx
                      Banned
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • May 2008
                      • 13892
                      • 225
                      • 108
                      • 15,442

                      #30
                      Originally posted by ЯiZO
                      Lewis, yes. Holyfield...NO WAY!
                      come on man ..holyfield would beat the **** outta marciano

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP