Joe Calzaghe - Master of millennium

[C.Y.]

lol at how biased you are, How was Calzaghe "Surviving " against Hopkins??????????????????????????????????????????? ????????????????????????????????????????

Zaghe wern't the one exagerating a low blow in different rounds just to avoid fighting another few minutes

joe also WASNT landing too many clean effective punches and HE also got knocked on his ass

Your boy Joe said it himself that was the toughest fight of his career.. and it was a split decision victory.. his face looked ****ed up and he looked sloppy thru the majority of the fight.. i call that suriving

[-----------]

joe also WASNT landing too many clean effective punches and HE also got knocked on his ass

Your boy Joe said it himself that was the toughest fight of his career.. and it was a split decision victory.. his face looked ****ed up and he looked sloppy thru the majority of the fight.. i call that suriving

Joes toughest fight of his career was against Eubank.

He says this time and time again.

[WhoreUs]

So even though Hopkins schools a prime Pavlik, who was undefeated at the time, after the Joe fight, it counts for nothing.

But if Kessler beats Pavlik, after Hopkins has just beat him, it adds to Calzaghes legacy.

YOU CONTRADICTIVE BASTARD

did i say just kessler beat pavlik? i said if mikkel unifies 168 and get some good name wins LIKE taylor or pavlik.

of course hopkins was a good win for joe. hopkins , old fart that he is , is still top level fighter and had a 175 belt but people are not gonna trump that up as some heroic , monumental victory unless they're welsh wankers.

you bloody welsh are defensive , sensitive ****s......

[-----------]

did i say just kessler beat pavlik? i said if mikkel unifies 168 and get some good name wins LIKE taylor or pavlik.

of course hopkins was a good win for joe. hopkins , old fart that he is , is still top level fighter and had a 175 belt but people are not gonna trump that up as some heroic , monumental victory unless their welsh wankers.

you bloody welsh are defensive , sensitive ****s......

Ok then, Calzaghes win over B-Hop means hardly anything.


I'm sick of the haters on this site, no substance behind their arguments.

[C.Y.]

Joes toughest fight of his career was against Eubank.

He says this time and time again.

oh really? i could of sworn i heard him say bhop was the toughest.. ok so joe's toughest fights were against old guys?

[WhoreUs]

Ok then, Calzaghes win over B-Hop means hardly anything.


I'm sick of the haters on this site, no substance behind their arguments.

did i say hopkins win means nothing?!?!!?

i said it's a good win but you shouldn't trump it up as joe's greatest it defeats the purpose.

one is best off trumping his win over eubank while being somewhat green still.

one is best off trumping being champion for more than a decade and being the best 168 guy ever.

one is best off trumping unifying 168.

you trump up hopkins as some glorious victory and the yanks will say "he was 43 yrs. old! that's joe's greatest accomplishment?"

[-----------]

oh really? i could of sworn i heard him say bhop was the toughest.. ok so joe's toughest fights were against old guys?

Lmao, obvious hater, prepare to get owned, ok, read on.

Calzaghe's first 12 rounder (having previously only fought 8 rounds MAX) was against former world champion and British icon Chris Eubank who was only 31 at the time.

Calzaghe who went into the ring later in the night than expected, dehydrated after about 1:30 hrs warm up wnet into the ring already pumped, knocking Eubank down in the first 20 seconds, went all out in the next 4 rounds to take him out. Eubank stood, and took Calzaghe the distance, giving him his toughest fight to date.


So yea, Calzaghes toughest fights were against old guys.

[-----------]

did i say hopkins win means nothing?!?!!?

i said it's a good win but you shouldn't trump it up as joe's greatest it defeats the purpose.

one is best off trumping his win over eubank while being somewhat green still.

one is best off trumping being champion for more than a decade and being the best 168 guy ever.

one is best off trumping unifying 168.

you trump up hopkins as some glorious victory and the yanks will say "he was 43 yrs. old! that's joe's greatest accomplishment?"

When have I said it was his greatest victory?

Where in my post did I say the Hopkins win means nothing?

[Flawless 2]

Lmao, obvious hater, prepare to get owned, ok, read on.

Calzaghe's first 12 rounder (having previously only fought 8 rounds MAX) was against former world champion and British icon Chris Eubank who was only 31 at the time.

Calzaghe who went into the ring later in the night than expected, dehydrated after about 1:30 hrs warm up wnet into the ring already pumped, knocking Eubank down in the first 20 seconds, went all out in the next 4 rounds to take him out. Eubank stood, and took Calzaghe the distance, giving him his toughest fight to date.


So yea, Calzaghes toughest fights were against old guys.

First of all idiot, age doesn't determine if you are prime or not. You know Eubank took this fight at short notice and entered 2 weeks of a weight draining regime. You call a weight drained past his prime fighter Joe hardest win.

[WhoreUs]

When have I said it was his greatest victory?

Where in my post did I say the Hopkins win means nothing?

you were implying that i think hopkins win hardly means anything.

never mind...... argue with the calzaghe haters...... i shouldn't even bother giving my 2 cents on the topic i end up arguing against both sides.