Who here actually keeps scorecards when watching a fight?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • RAESAAD
    THE MUTHA****IN TRUTH
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jul 2005
    • 24331
    • 2,370
    • 1,730
    • 40,454

    #11
    Originally posted by The_Bull
    Who here keeps a scorecard when watching a fight?

    I don't. I kinda juat watch the fight and determine the winner on who I saw with my own eyes deal out more damage through out the bout. Its like a streetfight, people ask you well who won? Well you always say the one who dealt out more punishment won. Ive tried keeping a scorecard and I just dont find it entertaining or meaningful.
    I do about half the time I watch big fights or am alone but usually I have friends over and I'm drinking so it's pointless.....

    Comment

    • Ramamaiden
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jan 2007
      • 1744
      • 53
      • 102
      • 8,001

      #12
      normally i count the first 3 or 4 rounds...then i just prefer to enjoy the fight, without caring too much of the scoring.

      Comment

      • wmute
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Nov 2003
        • 8084
        • 289
        • 446
        • 15,158

        #13
        Always, but except a couple of times it was in my head

        90% of the times I lose track... lol

        Comment

        • -Boxzilla-
          undisputed
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jun 2008
          • 7975
          • 1,230
          • 1,610
          • 14,970

          #14
          lederman keeps track for me and then i decide if i agree with him or not ...

          Comment

          • AceNguyen
            Interim Champion
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Mar 2008
            • 605
            • 25
            • 4
            • 6,704

            #15
            I don't find scoring a fight distracting or bothersome, I just usually type down whoever won the last round since I'm usually on these forums a lot of big fights anyway. There's no way of knowing how accurate my judging is, but 95% of the time the guy I think won the round ends up having more punches landed, so I think that I'm fair. I honestly have no clue what judges are watching sometimes, it really pisses me off when they seem to give a guy a lot of "pity rounds" (Katsidis-Diaz anyone?) and it ends up messing up the scores big time.

            Comment

            • savorduhflavor
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Oct 2008
              • 8194
              • 288
              • 59
              • 14,875

              #16
              I pretty much always do.

              Comment

              • AceNguyen
                Interim Champion
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Mar 2008
                • 605
                • 25
                • 4
                • 6,704

                #17
                Originally posted by 3zilla
                lederman keeps track for me and then i decide if i agree with him or not ...
                Lederman scores for who throws more punches, not for who lands more. His judgment is ridiculously biased towards swarming fighters, I don't even bother with his scoring anymore.

                Comment

                • Texas Made
                  Texas Raised
                  • Sep 2008
                  • 790
                  • 34
                  • 17
                  • 7,171

                  #18
                  I do it just about all the time. It keeps me watching and keeps me from getting distracted. Also it helps so you know wtf your talking about
                  yea, it makes it funner to watch the fights to me at least, its kinda like Fantasy Football in the sense that it adds a little something to the fight

                  Comment

                  • -Boxzilla-
                    undisputed
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Jun 2008
                    • 7975
                    • 1,230
                    • 1,610
                    • 14,970

                    #19
                    Originally posted by AceNguyen
                    Lederman scores for who throws more punches, not for who lands more. His judgment is ridiculously biased towards swarming fighters, I don't even bother with his scoring anymore.
                    i dont always agree with him, i sometimes think hes watched a completely different round then what i had just watched. but in general hes a former judge and i think he knows what to look for in terms of judging.

                    Comment

                    • The_Bull
                      Banned
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Sep 2008
                      • 1873
                      • 74
                      • 164
                      • 2,224

                      #20
                      Originally posted by 3zilla
                      i dont always agree with him, i sometimes think hes watched a completely different round then what i had just watched. but in general hes a former judge and i think he knows what to look for in terms of judging.
                      I think he almost always gets it right in my book except when he had Williams beating Quintana the first time around.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP