BHOP is a bad man........

[MELLY-MEL...]

beat up tarver, winky, pavlik, and was very tight with calzaghe. all in his 40's? i mean come on, if that don't say HELLO!!!!!!!!!!!, and earn mad respect i don't what to tell ya. RESPECT BERNARD, your a ****ing legend, living!!!!!!!!!

[S A M U R A I]

'Nard kicks ass.



100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

[Ben_London]

beat up tarver, winky, pavlik, and was very tight with calzaghe. all in his 40's? i mean come on, if that don't say HELLO!!!!!!!!!!!, and earn mad respect i don't what to tell ya. RESPECT BERNARD, your a ****ing legend, living!!!!!!!!!

I hold him in the highest regard, he's a legend but he's also a sore loser, refusing to give credit to Taylor or Calzaghe.

His interviews are entertaining though.

[Lord13]

Joe is even badder.
He made Popkins his *****.

[Scott9945]

I'm not a Hopkins fan, but there is no fighter whose ring savvy and skills I respect more.

[ßringer]

In what I've learned talking to Joe fans today, the W over Roy means more in their eyes than the W over Bernard.

There's this fake ass aura that Jones was better than Hopkins but really that's not the case. He was a more gifted athlete for sure, but he wasn't the better fighter.

Bernard slayed the man that slayed Jones 3 times in Tarver.

Jones was slain by a man Hopkins TKO'd 10 years ago in his prime in Johnson.

Calzaghe had much more difficulty eeking out a narrow SD win over Hopkins than he did battering the piss out of Roy last night for 33 minutes.

Roy couldn't pull the trigger on a damn near 3 year retirement having, 6 year past prime Trinidad who Hopkins blew apart in his prime 7 years ago.

Not to mention the fact that all of Roy's losses come by one sided embarassing knockouts and shutouts, while all of Bernard comes by the narrowest of split decision margins and all are debatable.

Take Bernard Hopkins name off Roy Jones record and Roy's greatness shrinks dramatically. Whereas Hopkins never needed Roy's name to cement his legacy, he did it on his own, and without fanfare.

15 years later the debate is over: Hopkins > Roy.

I'm not ****ting on Roy either, but I've known Hopkins was the better man for years now. And last night pretty much cemented it.

[Lord13]

Jones beat Popkins so he's better.
Put 2 and 2 together ******s.

[ßringer]

I hold him in the highest regard, he's a legend but he's also a sore loser, refusing to give credit to Taylor or Calzaghe.

His interviews are entertaining though.

I'm sure if you were a highly decorated World Champion, future hall of famer and current ATG, you'd have a hard time swallowing 2 narrow split decision losses and 1 narrow ud loss to Taylor and Joe as well.

Bernard hates to lose, and a lot of people thought he won those fights.

His argument isn't entirely ridiculous.

[El Dominicano]

Joe is even badder.
He made Popkins his *****.

With his accurate punching?

[ßringer]

Jones beat Popkins so he's better.
Put 2 and 2 together ******s.

As I said, without Bernard on his record Roy looks even weaker than he already does.

Without Roy on Bernard's record and it's exactly the same as it is right now.