Calzaghe is delusional and the Biggest Joke

[AndyShitHot]

lol? he beat the guys who just knocked shot roy jones out. calzaghe couldnt even hurt jones and was almost ko'd by him. IDIOTTTTTTTTTTTTTT

**** man, did u fall asleep during the fight and start dreaming, damn u missed a good but totally one sided fight

[AndyShitHot]

[QUOTE=Clegg;4297172]I'm a Calzaghe fan too, but you guys need to stop with this stuff. Dawson is a fantastic fighter, and if Calzaghe beat him it would take everything he had to do it IMO.

This was Calzaghe's first ever fight in a PPV main event, so acting as if he's some untouchable megastar or something...come on. Dawson is the best fighter from 160-175 that Calzaghe is yet to face.[/QUOTE]

Yeah he is, and that in itself explains why Joe is well within his right to retire.

[Grimmer]

lol? he beat the guys who just knocked shot roy jones out. calzaghe couldnt even hurt jones and was almost ko'd by him. IDIOTTTTTTTTTTTTTT

Hypocrit!

You'll discreit Joe for beating a "shot" fighter but then call Dawsons win over Johnson a credible win? Wtf? And Dawson didn't even win in a convincing fashion.

[dave777]

Joe is a fraud, Even Frank Warren is saying it now!

Shut up!

Warren got sacked by Joe

[Chr0nic]

i agree...

even though jones is only 2 years older...calzaghe has fought scrubs and jones has been in hard fights

4 years differrence, and for people who dont get it, your decline is 35 years, joe is 1 year into the decline, roy is nearly 5 years into it

[Dawerlzgreatest]

4 years differrence, and for people who dont get it, your decline is 35 years, joe is 1 year into the decline, roy is nearly 5 years into it

well

the decline depends on your lifestyle and diet also..but the 4 year difference is compounded by the fact that roy has been kod before and in many more grueling fights

[Chr0nic]

well

the decline depends on your lifestyle and diet also..but the 4 year difference is compounded by the fact that roy has been kod before and in many more grueling fights

that too, no one is ever the same after getting knocked out, and i think that's a fact

[CottoOverrated1]

Hypocrit!

You'll discreit Joe for beating a "shot" fighter but then call Dawsons win over Johnson a credible win? Wtf? And Dawson didn't even win in a convincing fashion.

stop right there, dumb ass. big difference between a 40 year old glenn johnson and a 39 year old jones. nohnson is still a live opponent that will **** you up, and he is still hungry and wants to win big fights. jones isnt live anymore. he just there to survive. from 2004 and up, johnson is the superior fighter compared to jones. sorry. joe would get all he could handle against johnson, and johnson's stamina is very very good.

dawson's wins over johnson and tarver(most of you yanks thought woods would destroy tarver) >>>>>> calzaghe's wins over hopkins and jones. hell dawson's performance against johnson was light years ahead of joe's performance against hopkins. And dont even defend against that statement, cuz joe would agree with that.

[Porter's Dad]

I'm a Calzaghe fan too, but you guys need to stop with this stuff. Dawson is a fantastic fighter, and if Calzaghe beat him it would take everything he had to do it IMO.

This was Calzaghe's first ever fight in a PPV main event, so acting as if he's some untouchable megastar or something...come on. Dawson is the best fighter from 160-175 that Calzaghe is yet to face.

Good post.

Some of the hyteria on here immediately after big fights boreds on the obscene.

[MANGLER]

Hate him if you must, which I'm close to doin right now, but stuff the bias. He won and got off the canvas in rd 1 to do so. Give the man his due.