Will Jones look better than Hop did a few weeks ago?

[Ray Ray]

Hopkins put on a beautiful display of boxing! I was shocked on how he dominated Pavlik. He didnt let him get off and took his best punch (his right hand) away from him...I dont see Roy doing what Hopkins did. Hopkins is more of a defensive type of fighter and he was able to get out of harms way with Pavlik...Roy doesnt have the defensive skills as Hopkins does but Roy has the better offense...I think Roy will do his thing but he wont be as dominate as Hopkins was against Pavlik.

And to touch on something eles... Someone brought up the speed differense in Calzghe and Pavlik...Palvik plots foward and doesnt seem to have a plan B or C (which he showed in the Hopkins fight) Joe can adjust and has a back up plan if the first gameplan isnt quite working.

[THE REED]

of course roy can hurt him, joe is human... just because ur 45-0 doesnt mean u cant lose, just because u havent been hurt much doesnt mean u cant be hurt

[steptwome]

of course roy can hurt him, joe is human... just because ur 45-0 doesnt mean u cant lose, just because u havent been hurt much doesnt mean u cant be hurt

..........cosign

[COACH WEBB]

of course roy can hurt him, joe is human... just because ur 45-0 doesnt mean u cant lose, just because u havent been hurt much doesnt mean u cant be hurt

fa sho....I hear u bro...

[THE REED]

ricky was 43-0, thats because he never faced a floyd mayweather jr

pavlik was 34-0... thats because he never faced a bernard hopkins

diaz was undefeated thats because he never faced a nate campbell



and joe calzaghe.......... has never faced a roy jones jr

[Ray Ray]

ricky was 43-0, thats because he never faced a floyd mayweather jr

pavlik was 34-0... thats because he never faced a bernard hopkins

diaz was undefeated thats because he never faced a nate campbell



and joe calzaghe.......... has never faced a roy jones jr

I hope you're right...I'm thinking about going all out on this fight!

[TheGreatAli]

ricky was 43-0, thats because he never faced a floyd mayweather jr

pavlik was 34-0... thats because he never faced a bernard hopkins

diaz was undefeated thats because he never faced a nate campbell



and joe calzaghe.......... has never faced a roy jones jr

With all do respect, none of those fighters are as good as Calzaghe.

[COACH WEBB]

With all do respect, none of those fighters are as good as Calzaghe.

hahahhaaha....Hatton isn't.....

[Tony628]

ricky was 43-0, thats because he never faced a floyd mayweather jr

pavlik was 34-0... thats because he never faced a bernard hopkins

diaz was undefeated thats because he never faced a nate campbell



and joe calzaghe.......... has never faced a roy jones jr

yeah but joe isn't one dimensional unlike the fighters you mentioned.

[El Dominicano]

what do u think gives Joe the edge in this fight?

I know your not asking me but like I've said before. The only advantage Joe has is stamina and quicker feet. I don't think its enough to win because I saw a recent video on RJJ and Roy looked MUCH lighter on his feet