how many belts do you need to become undisputed?

[ATFsven]

oh dear.
undisputed... the clue is in the NAME!!

these days i suppose you need all 4 major belts as the WBO is has more recognition. but a few years a go it was IBF/WBC/WBA and as the WBO didnt count then you was undisputed.

[ATFsven]

Nate could collect all the belts... but until he beats Marquez he wont be undisputed..

[boxing_great]

oh dear.
undisputed... the clue is in the NAME!!

these days i suppose you need all 4 major belts as the WBO is has more recognition. but a few years a go it was IBF/WBC/WBA and as the WBO didnt count then you was undisputed.

well right now vic is undisputed , and he only has 3 belts.

[xzworks]

4 major belts plus or 3 hbo commentators 1 ring article labelling you as the undisputed.

[ATFsven]

well right now vic is undisputed , and he only has 3 belts.

But he isnt.. not really. i dont care what HBO or whoever says..

[sparked_85]

It's hard to say.

Let's say Hatton beat Malignaggi. Bradley unifies one of the other belts another guy unifies the other two belts. There is a fight with four belts on the line and the winner still couldn't be viewed as undisputed because Ricky Hatton would still be undefeated and the man in that division and the ring magazine champion at that weight?

Seems unlikey to be able to unify all four titles anyway, the IBF strip everyone almost instantly for not fighting mandatories.

[Flawless 2]

Nate could collect all the belts... but until he beats Marquez he wont be undisputed..

JMM has the ring title so if he won he wouldn;t be undisputed as Pacman has a LW title

[BlackHat]

What if you hold all 4 belts + the ring but then someone is dis*****g, are you still undisputed?

[Randall_Hopkirk]

It's the WBA, WBC and IBF. Assuming the WBO champion is lame (which is usually the case).

[ATFsven]

JMM has the ring title so if he won he wouldn;t be undisputed as Pacman has a LW title

Thats what i am saying
i just forgot about pac wooops.