Why hasn't Calslappy fought that fruit David Haye?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • FloydsEra
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Aug 2008
    • 2527
    • 86
    • 31
    • 2,803

    #1

    Why hasn't Calslappy fought that fruit David Haye?

    This I gotta know.
  • KESSLER
    GOONER FOR LIFE
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • May 2007
    • 15487
    • 782
    • 716
    • 24,000

    #2
    Because David Haye is a guy who struggled to make the cruiserweight limit when Calzaghe was fighting @ 168.

    Comment

    • ATFsven
      Interim Champion
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Nov 2007
      • 710
      • 20
      • 1
      • 7,083

      #3
      i would think haye has about 50lb on Joe

      Comment

      • FloydsEra
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Aug 2008
        • 2527
        • 86
        • 31
        • 2,803

        #4
        oh, I thought Haye was a light heavyweight. my bad

        Comment

        • FloydsEra
          Banned
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Aug 2008
          • 2527
          • 86
          • 31
          • 2,803

          #5
          Originally posted by Tunney
          Haye's not a fruit, he's bisexual. I've read he said he's been with over 500 women, and only 20 men. So clearly, he prefers women or the numbers would be reversed.
          gay **** stars shag women all the time. They're still gay

          haye's a ****. get over it. you can call him gay or bisexual, but he is gay. End of Thre4AD

          Comment

          • Addition
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Dec 2007
            • 8534
            • 306
            • 140
            • 20,828

            #6
            Originally posted by Tunney
            Haye's not a fruit, he's bisexual. I've read he said he's been with over 500 women, and only 20 men. So clearly, he prefers women or the numbers would be reversed.
            You're still going on about this, even though it's FALSE?

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP