Hopkins would have PWNED Hagler, Hearns and Ray Robinson

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Duke McKenzie_
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Feb 2008
    • 1586
    • 169
    • 162
    • 3,108

    #31
    Originally posted by DonFlamenco
    duke are you just trying to get reactions out of us?
    Why would I do that for, kid?


    I reckon you've just GONE... you're absolutely GONE in this thread, you're hanging on for dear life.

    Comment

    • El Dominicano
      Banned
      • Aug 2007
      • 10074
      • 226
      • 49
      • 10,758

      #32
      Originally posted by Duke McKenzie_
      Did Hagler or Sugar Ray make 20 defences of a middleweight belt?

      ****, there's no way Hagler would have been able to beat Pavlik or Howard Eastman, and I doubt Sugar Ray would have got past Robert Allen once, let alone three times. Sugar just couldn't compete with Hopkins's mad skillz.

      Don't even talk to me about Hearns. If Hearns had got in the ring with Tito or Oscar we'd have been calling him Thomas "The ****man" Hearns right now.



      WAR HOPKINS!!!!!
      I know your playin around and stuff but why does it sound like you mean it?

      Comment

      • RisAri0
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Aug 2005
        • 3519
        • 77
        • 4
        • 16,154

        #33
        Roy in his prime though I believe was invincible..even to great legends in their time...

        Comment

        • squealpiggy
          Stritctly UG's friend
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jan 2007
          • 28896
          • 2,028
          • 1,603
          • 66,600

          #34
          You know Hagler, Hearns and Leonard should be happy that they weren't in the era of Andrew Council WHO HOPKINS BEAT!

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP