If calzaghe beats jones then beats b hop in rematch...

**The Gully Gad** · 10-30-2008, 07:53 AM

Originally posted by sbabbab

Will u consider him a ATG ?

I highly doubt it.

If he done this, who would he then need to beat to be a ATG

If he would of beaten Hop and Jones in there primes then yes
But catching them at the tail end of there careers dosent cut it..

This one has been discussed to death already i think mate

**ACHlLLES** · 10-30-2008, 07:53 AM

He is already an ATG, unless you can join boxing and do what he has done. Because most people who join boxing can never accomplish as much as joe has done.

**sbabbab** · 10-30-2008, 07:54 AM

Originally posted by The Gully Gad

If he would of beaten Hop and Jones in there primes then yes
But catching them at the tail end of there careers dosent cut it..

This one has been discussed to death already i think mate

sorry pal, didnt no

**The Gully Gad** · 10-30-2008, 07:54 AM

Originally posted by sbabbab

sorry pal, didnt no

Nah its cool bro just telling you like..

But yeh my answer is no he cant

**boxasmash** · 10-30-2008, 07:57 AM

he already is an atg.

how many people reached 21 defences won all alphabet titles and at the same time beat undefeated fighters like kessler, lacy and a legend in hopkins and possibly jones.

**ACHlLLES** · 10-30-2008, 07:58 AM

It's probably about 95 percent(or more) of boxers haven't accomplished what Calzaghe, Pacquiao, and Mayweather have accomplished in this sport.

**hammerhiem** · 10-30-2008, 08:01 AM

NO.

And besides he will reite after the Jones fight regaurdless of the result.

he's not one of these boxers who has nothing but boxing and cannot live without it. He's rich, got a family and enjoys working on TV I can see him being a pundit in a couple of years.

**Stickman** · 10-30-2008, 08:03 AM

Originally posted by The Gully Gad

If he would of beaten Hop and Jones in there primes then yes
But catching them at the tail end of there careers dosent cut it..

This one has been discussed to death already i think mate

It should be noted that Calzaghe is also at the "tail end" of his career. Also that Hopkins is, so far as I can tell, a much smarter, better fighter than he was in his prime, and I'd actually give today's Hopkins a better chance against a prime Jones than the younger version that fought him.

**boxasmash** · 10-30-2008, 08:04 AM

Originally posted by Stickman

It should be noted that Calzaghe is also at the "tail end" of his career. Also that Hopkins is, so far as I can tell, a much smarter, better fighter than he was in his prime, and I'd actually give today's Hopkins a better chance against a prime Jones than the younger version that fought him.

most definitely.

hopkins proved how elite he was when he stomped pavlik.

If calzaghe beats jones then beats b hop in rematch...