i disagree with this. Floyd was interesting in the first 24/7. in the second, is it was a the same ****, different fight. "i got money", "my daddy didnt love me growing up", "i got money".
there was no new or true substance to floyd in the second series. but i guess that will happen when you highlight the same fighter again.
there was no new or true substance to floyd in the second series. but i guess that will happen when you highlight the same fighter again.
Comment