When we talk about a fighter, and his atg position....

[steptwome]

Everything, but obviously, losing at the end of your career when you're washed up doesn't take much at all from a guy's legacy. That's the norm in boxing, for a great to fight on too long until he's a shell of what he once was.

........I agree

[MANGLER]

Prime time matters most, but the whole career should be looked at. This is why there's such a constant debate about Tyson bein considered great or not. Durin his prime he was great, but overall he fell apart and became a joke. I voted both although prime is what really counts, cuz post prime accomplishments look great, but nobody discredits fighters for their post prime losses.

[KESSLER]

Their career as a whole. With most of the focus being on their primes, I'd say.