Whose performance was worse: Peter or Pavlik?

[JakeNDaBox]

Pavlik tried and got outclassed. No harm in that, there is always someone who has somebody elses number.

Peter didn't really try, got thorughly outclassed by an inactive for over 3 years ageing former champion whose body is creaking more than a rocking chair and has repeatedly failed him in the past, and then to put that cherry on the cake he quit. Wonderful performance.

well said. And not only did Peter look that way, but did so against a man he spent the past year or so throwing under the bus.

Peter fought and physically looked like he never expected Vitali to make it out of training camp. I think he knew what everyone else suggested - that a healthy Vitali beats him 10 out 10 times - and fought accordingly.

But I agree, quitting on his stool was the absolute clincher if this is even an argument (which it isn't, IMO).

[deevel79]

Peter quit. Pavlik didnt. End of thread.

[steptwome]

This has to be a RHETORICAL question.
So I'll have fun with it......

SPAEMTUEER L

[larryx]

atleast pavlik tried..peter didnt do ****

[Thread Stealer]

Peter.

Pavlik kept trying at least, and Vitali is no Hopkins, even a 43 year old Hopkins. Hopkins is an ATG who still is a very formidable fighter. Vitali hadn't fought in 4 years and Peter still got dominated.

[Underdog82]

I am surprised so few put pavlik. Pavlik didn't do crap the entire fight with Hopkins I thought that was an awful performance by him. He could of done way better.