Will Boxing Catch On To The Catch at Catchweights?

**GreatestIam** · 10-21-2008, 02:32 AM

Dude sounds like an ******* for the first few paragraphs then tries to give Hop credit but, this ish is offensive to me

**Espada** · 10-21-2008, 02:37 AM

Trinidad, DLH, Wright and now Pavlik..

I always notice why they need to move up several divisions just to fight Hopkins. He's beating small fighters

**Sin City** · 10-21-2008, 02:41 AM

Originally posted by GreatestIAM

Dude sounds like an ******* for the first few paragraphs then tries to give Hop credit but, this ish is offensive to me

Is he lying??

**ListenUpWell** · 10-21-2008, 03:29 AM

Hopkins Vs Pavlik one of the least watchable major fights in recent memory? Is that a joke? I thought it was great...

**JakeNDaBox** · 10-21-2008, 06:49 AM

Originally posted by ListenUpWell

Hopkins Vs Pavlik one of the least watchable major fights in recent memory? Is that a joke? I thought it was great...

I was referring to Hopkins-Wright, which was mentioned in the sentence/paragraph that preceded the comment.

**ListenUpWell** · 10-21-2008, 07:23 AM

Oh **** sorry, my bad.

**MANGLER** · 10-21-2008, 08:27 AM

Some of these catchweight fights are good ones, but I agree they don't really prove ****.

**BLOODGOD** · 10-21-2008, 08:34 AM

Catch weight fights is bad for boxing..

**sparked_85** · 10-21-2008, 08:35 AM

I didn't think this was a bad one, Pavlik is a big man.

It when you get Winky Wright fighting at 170 that it becomes disturbing.

Comment