How anyone could call Abraham a technical boxer is beyond me. There is nothing technical about what Abraham does. Nothing crafty, nothing tricky, it is what it is.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
well... now who wins ABRAHAM -vs- PAVLIK ??
Collapse
-
Before this weekend I said Pavlik. I still do. This was only one fight.
I think Pavlik wins a decision by sheer workrate. AA still takes too much time of in rounds. That will probably worsen as AA struggles to get to 160.
That somebody can vote for a Pavlik KO is beyond me. AA is THE mr. Unknockoutable in boxing today. But of course the Abrahammer can land anytime spreadeagleing Pavlik, so Pavlik's got to watch out!
Comment
-
I think Pavlik's jab and reach could give Abraham trouble. But I don't think Pavlik wants to get into a slugfest with Abraham. Would be fight of 2009.
Comment
-
-
-
I think Pavlik wins, he's a better boxer than Abraham, who's a puncher. Bernard Hopkins is a master in boxing technique, Abraham is no where near Hopkins' knowledge of mastery, so don't downplay Pavlik, he lost to a master, Arthur is has mediocre boxing skills and just has power
Comment
-
Originally posted by VanesBoxing View Postback to 160 where the two champs hopefully unify the middleweight titles next year...
sadly Pavlik lost his BIG 0 which takes quite a bit out of this much anitcipated matchup...
will he still give King Arthur a real tough fight or was he somewhat EXECUTED both mentally and phisically.
Comment
-
Comment