Bias is a 4 letter word....

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • freedom213
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Apr 2006
    • 3388
    • 112
    • 164
    • 10,016

    #1

    Bias is a 4 letter word....

    so much bias on these boards it's ridiculous. After the Hopkin's fight people should be discussing things like how amazing Hopkin's abilities are to absolutely work a fight, a pre-fight , building his fight strategy and adjusting his game , going back to being a higher volume fighter even in the face of a heavy handed punching machine like Pavlik. Instead it's like a bunch of spoiled kid's, too many poster's who are pissed because they were wrong on their predictions or want to use this fight as a sounding board to prop up their fighter, cue Joe CAlzaghe fan's. What happens if Pavlik does get a shot at CAlzaghe and KO's him brutally? What would people say then? This fight was simply a perfect execution from the Executioner and if he can truly keep fighting with is new found energy it will be tough for anyone to beat him at or a round this weight class.

    One thing that people need to slow down on are these comparison's on fighter X beat fighter Y so no way no how can he fighter X ever beat so and so,please. This is the beauty of boxing at the highest level.

    Props to Hopkin's and Prop's to Pavik for giving it all he had and learning a big lesson.
  • Murray
    The Demonic Boxing Fan
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Apr 2008
    • 1177
    • 63
    • 18
    • 7,502

    #2
    Originally posted by freedom213
    so much bias on these boards it's ridiculous. After the Hopkin's fight people should be discussing things like how amazing Hopkin's abilities are to absolutely work a fight, a pre-fight , building his fight strategy and adjusting his game , going back to being a higher volume fighter even in the face of a heavy handed punching machine like Pavlik. Instead it's like a bunch of spoiled kid's, too many poster's who are pissed because they were wrong on their predictions or want to use this fight as a sounding board to prop up their fighter, cue Joe CAlzaghe fan's. What happens if Pavlik does get a shot at CAlzaghe and KO's him brutally? What would people say then? This fight was simply a perfect execution from the Executioner and if he can truly keep fighting with is new found energy it will be tough for anyone to beat him at or a round this weight class.

    One thing that people need to slow down on are these comparison's on fighter X beat fighter Y so no way no how can he fighter X ever beat so and so,please. This is the beauty of boxing at the highest level.

    Props to Hopkin's and Prop's to Pavik for giving it all he had and learning a big lesson.
    The forums are largely biased and always will be.

    Hopkins is getting much credit and Pavlik is getting trashed as usual when a big fight takes place, the guy who loses often gets "Exposed".

    But to say Pavlik gave it all he had is wrong I think we all say Pavlik was off for some reason..whether or not he gave up or not..no clue but Hopkins had the correct game plan and executed it perfectly. Was it a good fight for a non biased fight fan? I didnt think so! I was hoping for a more competative fight with a higher output from Kelly.

    Comment

    • Weebler I
      El Weeblerito I
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Dec 2007
      • 31113
      • 1,468
      • 1,648
      • 54,550

      #3
      Calzaghe pwned Hopkin

      Pavlik was technically poor

      Comment

      • freedom213
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Apr 2006
        • 3388
        • 112
        • 164
        • 10,016

        #4
        Originally posted by The Weebler II
        Calzaghe pwned Hopkin

        Pavlik was technically poor
        yeah your in love with these kinda statements but for all the money a rematch could generate you think Calzaghe will give Hopkins another shot?
        You know better. Calzaghe is a good fighter, with an awkward as hell fighting style. Could he have handled the Bernard Hopkins from last night? Don't know but I want to see it.

        Comment

        • bsrizpac
          Banned
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • May 2004
          • 6837
          • 289
          • 21
          • 7,134

          #5
          Originally posted by The Weebler II
          Calzaghe pwned Hopkin

          Pavlik was technically poor
          You are just about the biggest idiot on this forum.

          Comment

          • Weebler I
            El Weeblerito I
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Dec 2007
            • 31113
            • 1,468
            • 1,648
            • 54,550

            #6
            ^
            fk u cumbag

            Originally posted by freedom213
            yeah your in love with these kinda statements but for all the money a rematch could generate you think Calzaghe will give Hopkins another shot?
            You know better. Calzaghe is a good fighter, with an awkward as hell fighting style. Could he have handled the Bernard Hopkins from last night? Don't know but I want to see it.
            I think Calzaghe wins even more convincingly in the next fight if it happens.

            In Wales, he embarrasses Hopkin who would be on the backfoot from start to finish with the crowd behind Calzaghe.

            Will it happen? hopkin might need another win to make it happen

            Has Pavlik never fought a proper defensive fighter before? he looked lost and naive

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP