so much bias on these boards it's ridiculous. After the Hopkin's fight people should be discussing things like how amazing Hopkin's abilities are to absolutely work a fight, a pre-fight , building his fight strategy and adjusting his game , going back to being a higher volume fighter even in the face of a heavy handed punching machine like Pavlik. Instead it's like a bunch of spoiled kid's, too many poster's who are pissed because they were wrong on their predictions or want to use this fight as a sounding board to prop up their fighter, cue Joe CAlzaghe fan's. What happens if Pavlik does get a shot at CAlzaghe and KO's him brutally? What would people say then? This fight was simply a perfect execution from the Executioner and if he can truly keep fighting with is new found energy it will be tough for anyone to beat him at or a round this weight class.
One thing that people need to slow down on are these comparison's on fighter X beat fighter Y so no way no how can he fighter X ever beat so and so,please. This is the beauty of boxing at the highest level.
Props to Hopkin's and Prop's to Pavik for giving it all he had and learning a big lesson.
One thing that people need to slow down on are these comparison's on fighter X beat fighter Y so no way no how can he fighter X ever beat so and so,please. This is the beauty of boxing at the highest level.
Props to Hopkin's and Prop's to Pavik for giving it all he had and learning a big lesson.
Comment