I Told You Pavlik Was One Dimensional!!!!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • luv3s2sp00g3
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Oct 2007
    • 454
    • 25
    • 5
    • 6,832

    #1

    I Told You Pavlik Was One Dimensional!!!!

    First off, I just wanna say to everyone I've discussed Pavlik with that I told you so!!!

    Secondly, I said this before: You just don't know boxing if you couldn't see Pavlik was one dimensional. He had no plan B. He can't box. And he definitely has no chance against Calzaghe. He does what he does well, but it isn't enough to beat a skilled defensive fighter or a skillful technician like Bhop or Calzaghe. If Bhop's handspeed befuddled Pavlik, then Calzaghe's handspeed + footspeed + upper body movement combo would box circles around Pavlik. You should have listened....
  • Fulcrum29
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Aug 2008
    • 4171
    • 171
    • 44
    • 4,430

    #2
    You Are Wise Beyond Your Years

    Comment

    • Squabbles94806
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Oct 2008
      • 2408
      • 54
      • 104
      • 2,886

      #3
      Pavlik's only 26. He learned one hell of a lesson. The more different opponents he boxes the more styles he'll me exposed to.

      Styles make fights, there are hella one dimensional fighters that went down in history: Rocky Marciano, Jake LaMotta, Mickey Ward, Ricky Hatton. Well some of them might have went down in history.

      I wasn't upset about the fight. A little one sided. But good for Hopkins. I didn't exactly want Hokins to lose, i just wanted Kelly Pavlik to win, for his career. But even his performance was okay. At least he didn't get knocked out bu B-hop. And Nard had enough respect not to go in carelessly for the KO.

      Comment

      Working...
      TOP