I think Morales was the underdog, but I might be mistaken.
After all, Morales had just lost to Barrera, and Pacquiao was still on an undefeated streak after his shocking (at the time) upset of Barrera 126.
It's really difficult to know that he is going to be unprofessional in the future though, don't you agree?
I mean, really, he hadn't ever not made weight for a fight back when there was talk of them fighting at 130, right?
By the way, I think the much better argument you should go for instead of Guzman is irrelevant... is that he moved up to 135, immediately took a belt and is taking a tougher fight right now as we speak. It's not like Pacquiao has taken a ton of fights off to fight weak competition, so there are reasons why he hasn't fought people like Valero, Soto and Guzman. It's not that he has been ducking them to fight terrible fighters, there are just too many good fighters out there right now.
After all, Morales had just lost to Barrera, and Pacquiao was still on an undefeated streak after his shocking (at the time) upset of Barrera 126.
It's really difficult to know that he is going to be unprofessional in the future though, don't you agree?
I mean, really, he hadn't ever not made weight for a fight back when there was talk of them fighting at 130, right?
By the way, I think the much better argument you should go for instead of Guzman is irrelevant... is that he moved up to 135, immediately took a belt and is taking a tougher fight right now as we speak. It's not like Pacquiao has taken a ton of fights off to fight weak competition, so there are reasons why he hasn't fought people like Valero, Soto and Guzman. It's not that he has been ducking them to fight terrible fighters, there are just too many good fighters out there right now.
Comment