Money Fights

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • vze2hhvj
    Banned
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Oct 2005
    • 390
    • 20
    • 1
    • 508

    #1

    Money Fights

    Is it me, or alot of pointless match ups happening in boxing? manny vs OScar....why! hopkins vs anyone....why! roy jones vs... why!
  • The Gully Gad
    Jeffery Hype
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jul 2008
    • 42711
    • 2,053
    • 2,263
    • 54,550

    #2
    Originally posted by vze2hhvj
    Is it me, or alot of pointless match ups happening in boxing? manny vs OScar....why! hopkins vs anyone....why! roy jones vs... why!
    Pointless but fun to watch neverless...

    Comment

    • Guest
      • 0
      • 0
      • 0

      #3
      Originally posted by vze2hhvj
      Is it me, or alot of pointless match ups happening in boxing? manny vs OScar....why! hopkins vs anyone....why! roy jones vs... why!
      Money baby. Makes the world go round. Makes ****ty musicians rich, makes bad movies #1 at the box office.
      Appeal to the lowest common denominator, and you rake in that cash.

      Comment

      • vze2hhvj
        Banned
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Oct 2005
        • 390
        • 20
        • 1
        • 508

        #4
        though its a money fight hop vs pav was amazing

        Comment

        • deevel79
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Dec 2005
          • 6831
          • 213
          • 27
          • 13,404

          #5
          I dont have a problem with money fights, as long as they're MEANINGFULL fights. There is no need for Pac/Oscar. There was no need for a Floyd/Oscar, or Floyd/Hatton rematch. One money fight i wouldnt mind seeing is Pac/Floyd @140.

          Comment

          • S.G.
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • May 2008
            • 9412
            • 296
            • 635
            • 16,360

            #6
            B Hop vs. Pavlik proved to be more than just a "money fight"

            Comment

            • deevel79
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Dec 2005
              • 6831
              • 213
              • 27
              • 13,404

              #7
              Originally posted by S.G.
              B Hop vs. Pavlik proved to be more than just a "money fight"
              I didnt see Pavlik/Hopkins as a "money fight" at all. It wasnt as if this fight was highly anticipated by the casual fans. It didnt even do great ppv numbers, nor was it expected to do so.

              Comment

              • FloydsEra
                Banned
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Aug 2008
                • 2527
                • 86
                • 31
                • 2,803

                #8
                Originally posted by deevel79
                I dont have a problem with money fights, as long as they're MEANINGFULL fights. There is no need for Pac/Oscar. There was no need for a Floyd/Oscar, or Floyd/Hatton rematch. One money fight i wouldnt mind seeing is Pac/Floyd @140.
                Pac/Floyd is worse than those other fights you mentioned. It wouldn't even be competitive. Everyone knows that except you

                Comment

                • Pullcounter
                  no guts no glory
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jan 2004
                  • 42582
                  • 549
                  • 191
                  • 49,739

                  #9
                  hopkins/pavlik wasn't a pointless fight. calz/rjj is pointless though. so is pac/dlh.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  TOP